期刊文献+

消费者学习与政府补贴下的制造商-供应商合作研发 被引量:6

Manufacturer-supplier Cooperation in R&D with Consumer Learning and Government Subsidies
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对代际产品的研发合作,考虑消费者的学习因素,建立了消费者学习与政府补贴下的制造商-供应商合作研发博弈模型,研究双方的最优研发投入以及制造商分担供应商的最优研发投入比例,比较了是否考虑消费者学习时双方的研发投入水平,分析了政府的研发补贴策略,进行了数值仿真。研究表明,在上述两种均衡下,制造商和供应商最优研发投入均随消费者学习能力的增加而增加,随代际产品周期(消费者学习阶段)的增加而降低。消费者学习时的制造商和供应商最优研发投入水平均高于不考虑消费者学习的情形。政府对供应商的研发补贴与消费者的学习水平对促进制造商和供应商研发投入的作用是互补的。消费者的学习提升了政府补贴对制造商和供应商提升研发投入的强度。 To study R&D cooperation of intergenerational products, the paper builds the manufacturer-supplier cooperative R&D game model based on consumer learning and government subsidies to study the optimal R&D expenditures of manufacturer-supplier and the optimal proportion of R&D expenditures that the manufacturer shares with the supplier. This paper compares the R&D expenditure levels of two firms based on consumer learning with those in the case without consumer learning, analyzes government R&D subsidy policy with consumer learning, and carries out numerical simulation. The results indicate an increase in learning factor increases the R^D expenditures of the two firms, and an increase in learning stage decreases the R&D expenditures in the two situations. Their R^D levels with consumer learning are higher than those in the case without consumer learning under the two equilibrium conditions. The impacts of government subsidies and consumer learning level on their R&D expenditures are complementary. Government subsidies motivate the two firms to increase more R&D? expenditures due to the existence of consumer learning.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1-7,共7页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972117) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(13CGL018) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20130032120014)
关键词 消费者学习水平 代际产品周期 合作研发 政府补贴 Consumer Learning Factor Intergenerational Product Cycle R&D Cooperation Government Subsidy
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献63

共引文献260

同被引文献65

  • 1孟卫军,张子健.供应链企业间产品创新合作下的政府补贴策略[J].系统工程学报,2010,25(3):359-364. 被引量:36
  • 2王玮,陈丽华.技术溢出效应下供应商与政府的研发补贴策略[J].科学学研究,2015,33(3):363-368. 被引量:13
  • 3汤大为,王红卫.强化学习算法在供应链环境下的库存控制中的应用[J].管理学报,2005,2(3):358-361. 被引量:3
  • 4Hinloopen J. Subsidizing cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers [J]. Journal of Economics, 1997,66(2) : 151-175. 被引量:1
  • 5Feldman M P, Link A N. Innovation Policy in the Knowl- edge- Based Economy for Public Policy [M]. Amsterdam: Cluwer Academic Publisher, 2001 : 73-74. 被引量:1
  • 6Jos6 Gil-Molt6 M. Poyago-Theotoky J. R&D Subsidies, spill- overs, and privatization in mixed markets[J]. Southern Eco- nomic Journal, 201 I, 78( 1 ) : 233-255. 被引量:1
  • 7Anita Miehalsen. R&D policy in a vertically related industry [J]. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 2012, 21 (8):737-751. 被引量:1
  • 8Franco C, Gussoni M. The role of firm and national level factors in fostering R&D cooperation: a cross country com- parison [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39 (6) : 945-976. 被引量:1
  • 9Gilbert S M, Cvsa V. Strategic commitment to price to stim- ulate downstream innovation in a supply chain [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2003,150(3) :617-639. 被引量:1
  • 10Cho R K, Gerchak Y. Supply chain coodination with down- stream operating costs: Coordination and investment to im- prove downstream operating efficiency [J]. European Jour- nal of Operational Research, 2005,162 (3) : 762-772. 被引量:1

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部