摘要
学术理性主义传统认为超自然信仰起因于各种各样的谬误,是缺乏批判力的思维对奇异的自然现象所作的非科学解释,因而必将随着教育和科技的日趋进步而衰亡消逝。本文主要论述围绕着现代理性主义和民间信仰而进行的学术讨论中所产生的观点,认为是文化进化论等社会科学中的唯物主义思想强制性地把现代思维和超自然信仰对立起来,事实上超自然信仰在当代社会中广泛存在。应用现象学方法对当代的超自然信仰和经验叙事进行分析,发现可以归纳并描述出其中属于逻辑的成分,在此基础上进一步考察逻辑推理在这类信仰和叙事建构过程中的作用。此外,这类叙事还十分重视对于证据的收集和嵌入,并采用重复等叙事策略来突显其合乎逻辑性。所以,超自然信仰和经验叙事虽看似与现代思维格格不入,其建构却是因着现代思维而存在的。
Academic rationalism thinks that supernatural belief traditions necessarily arise from various kinds of error,and it is a kind of unscientific interpretation of unusual natural phenomenon made by an uncritical mind. Therefore it has to decline gradually as education and technology increase day by day. This chapter will mainly address the climate of scholarly opinion that has surrounded academic discussions of modern rationalism and popular belief. The author points out the view that supernatural belief is only forced to be antithetical to modern thought by the materialistic or rationalistic approach used in social sciences. It is actually widespread in current society. When applying phenomenological approaches into the analysis on modern supernatural belief and experience narratives,it finds out that the logical components in supernatural belief is somewhat inductive and describable,and further the role of reasoning in the construction of such belief and experience narratives is testable. What's more,much importance is attached to the collection and embedded use of evidence in this construction. Also,the narrative strategy of duplication is often employed to highlight its logicality. So,much as it seems contrary to modern thought,supernatural belief and experience narratives do exist because of modern thought.
出处
《文化遗产》
CSSCI
2015年第6期34-44,共11页
Cultural Heritage
