摘要
新史学的首倡者梁启超曾提出要引进西方进化论作为衡量中国史的工具,随后产生的革命史叙事和现代化叙事在表面上虽有很大差异,但基本上也都秉持了西方历史观遵循的原则。尽管西方的中国学研究最近特别强调中国历史在西方影响到来之前就已存在现代因素,但这种"早期现代说"却仍潜在地遵循西式判别标准。实际上,中国史学内部保留着许多带有活力的传统概念,只要加以仔细辨析和应用,完全可以作为重建中国人文传统的可靠资源。
The initiator of New History Liang Qichao proposed to introduce the theory of evolution as a measurement tool of Chinese history.As a consequence,revolutionary history and the narration of modernization have been treated in the views of European history,though they are apparently different in many aspects.Some recent Chinese studies in the United States emphasized that there might be clues of modernization in China before the impact from the west.The theory of＂early modern＂somehow carried on western standard.Actually,there was an active tradition inside Chinese history.Looking into it provides us possibility to rebuild Chinese humanities.
出处
《中国人民大学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期102-113,共12页
Journal of Renmin University of China
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"清代‘大一统’观念与王朝政治再研究"(14JJD770019)
关键词
新史学
早期现代说
中层理论
本土概念
new history
early modern
the middle-range theory
local overview
