摘要
目的:探讨分析中医手法治疗骨折的临床应用疗效,指导临床选择最佳的治疗方法。方法:随机选取我院自2014年5月—2015年5月接收诊治的100例骨折患者作为研究对象,按照入院的先后顺序分为治疗组与对照组,每组50例。对于治疗组的50例骨折患者,采用中医手法治疗,而对于对照组的50例患者,给予西医治疗。观察记录所有作为研究对象的患者在治疗期间的临床疗效。结果:根据临床治疗所得到的数据分析可知,中医手法对于骨折患者的治疗骨折愈合时间较短、住院时间短,且发生后遗症的概率较小。显然,治疗组的临床疗效相较于对照组的治疗效果,更为显著。两组临床疗效对比具有显著性差异(P<0.05),研究具有统计学意义。讨论:中医手法对于骨折的临床疗效是显著的,值得临床推广。
Objective： To investigate the clinical effect of TCM in the treatment of fracture in order to guide the best clinical choice of the best treatment.. Methods： 100 cases of fractures admitted in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2014 to receive treatment were randomly selected as our research object; the clinical effect of these 100 patients were compared according to the clinical treatment. The subjects selected were divided into treatment group and control group with 50 cases of patients in each group. Control group patients were giving western medicine treatment while treatment group were treated with TCM methods. Results： according to the data analysis of clinical treatment, the treatment of fracture patients with TCM methods has short fracture healing and hospitalization time. Also the probability of occurrence of sequelae is small. Obviously, the clinical effect of the treatment group is more notable than that of the control group. Discussion： the clinical efficacy of TCM for fracture is remarkable, and it is worth to be popularized in clinical treatment.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2015年第30期120-122,共3页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
中医手法
西医
骨折
临床疗效
对比
Traditional Chinese medicine
Western medicine
Fracture
Clinical effect
Comparison
