摘要
随着当前犯罪防控重心向空间防控的转向,犯罪空间防控理论和策略成为犯罪治理的热门话题,尤其是结合了地理信息系统的GIS、CPTED、SCP等技术与理论逐渐受到追捧。然而,该类理论是战略理论还是策略理论,在方法上是策略还是战略,是工具主义、技术派的前行还是回归,两者的关系决定着犯罪防控的科学性前行方向。复兴的古典犯罪学派所提供的理论支持强调了犯罪预防的工具主义功能,这一功能迎合了现代化发展中的科学主义至上的时代观念,一切皆可被可量化的"有效性"实证主义检验。但是,对于犯罪学领域而言,科学主义手段和实证功能并不能取代犯罪学对整体犯罪预防战略目标的建构。如何避免犯罪预防战略目标的碎片化,犯罪预防战略与策略之目标的辨明就被赋予了双重意义。
As the prevention and control of crimes shifts to the spatial prevention and control currently, the theories of spatial prevention and control of crimes become popular in crime control. Especially those theories integrated with the technologies of geographical information system such as GIS, CPTED and SCP are increasingly commended. Yet it is essential to discern whether the theories are strategic or tactical, whether the methods of theories are strategic or tactical, and whether they are a step forward or regression of instrumentalism and technical priority. The relationship between the two determines the future orientation of the science of crime prevention and control. The theoretical support from the reviving classic criminology directly emphasizes the instrumental function in crime prevention, which meets the concept of the times that scientism is first and foremost in the development of modernization and that everything can be quantified and testified in ＂valid＂ empirical research. However, in terms of criminology, scientific means and empirical function cannot replace the construction of the overall strategic goals of crime prevention and control. Thus, it has double significance to distinguish between goals of strategies and tactics in order to avoid the fragmentation of the strategic goals of crime prevention and control.
出处
《上海大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期1-12,共12页
Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
犯罪学
犯罪空间
犯罪防控
犯罪空间防控
criminology
crime space
crime prevention and control
spatial prevention and control of crimes
