摘要
学界关于《楚辞》的原始篇次与《楚辞章句》篇次不同的论证,在逻辑上无法证明《楚辞释文》的篇次乃《楚辞》原次。常受关注的三点论据即《楚辞章句》于《九章》注中出现"皆解于《九辩》之中"之语、于《九辩》中释"九"、于《招魂》中释"招",只能标示出王逸的注次可能不同于《楚辞章句》的篇次。王逸注《楚辞》极有可能始于宋玉的《九辩》。今本《楚辞章句》面貌复杂,大致包含着五个阶段的注释。
The argumentation concerning the differences between the original order of works in The Odes of Chu and those of The Annotation of the Verses from the Odes of Chu, cannot prove that the orders of the verses in The Annotation of the Odes of Chu are not the original ones in The Odes of Chu. There are three arguments that draw frequent attention. In the Annotation of the Verses from the Odes of Chu, the words %11 explained in The Nine Debates＂ appeared in the annotation of The Nine Elegies, explained ＂Nine＂ in The Nine Debates and ＂summon＂ in The Requiem. All these merely indicate that Wang Yi＇s version is possibly different from that of The Annotation of the Verses from the Odes of Chu. It is very likely that his annotation towards The Odes of Chu was based on Song Yu＇s The Nine Debates. Tile contemporary versions of The Annotation of the Verses from the Odes of Chu are multitudinous, which roughly contain the annotations of five phases.
出处
《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2015年第5期136-140,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
楚辞
篇次
注次
The Odes of Chu
the order of works
the order of notes
