期刊文献+

不同风嘴形式的大跨度分体箱梁桥梁颤振性能 被引量:3

Flutter performance of long-span twin-box girder bridges with different wind fairing forms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分体箱梁可以有效地改善整体式钢箱梁断面的气动稳定性能,但不同的风嘴类型对分体箱梁的颤振稳定性能改善程度不同。通过节段模型风洞试验对两种风嘴形式的分体箱梁的颤振性能随槽宽演化规律进行了研究,将其与Larsen,Sato和作者前期的研究结果进行了对比,并从结构动力特性参数和气动外形两个关键方面解释了研究结果差异的原因。结果表明,不对称风嘴形式分体箱梁的颤振稳定性能对槽宽比的变化比较敏感,存在一个"最优槽宽比";对称风嘴形式分体箱梁对槽宽比的变化相对不太敏感,特别是当槽宽比较大时。与Larsen研究结果的差异主要是由结构及动力特性参数的改变造成的,其中质量惯矩的增大和扭弯比的减小起到了重要作用;与Sato研究所得结论的差异则主要源于气动外形的不同,特别是高宽比的改变。 Twin box girder could effectively improve the aerodynamic stability of the cross sections of integral steel box girders.However,different wind fairing forms make various contributions to the flutter stability of the twin box girder.In this study,the relation between the flutter characteristics and the slot width of the twin box girder for two fairing forms is investigated through wind tunnel tests using the section models.Then the experimental results are compared with the research results of Larsen′s,Sato′s and the former ones of the author′s.The reasons for the discrepancy among these results are analyzed from two critical aspects of the structural dynamic characteristic parameters and the aerodynamic configurations.Results show that the flutter characteristics of the twin box girder with the asymmetric wind fairing is sensitive to the slot-width ratio which is opposite to the twin box girder with the symmetric wind fairing,especially for the case of relative large slot-width ratio.The discrepancy of these study results between this paper and Larsen′s is attributed to the structural dynamic parameters,where the increase of the mass moment of inertia and the decrease of the torsion-bending moment ratio play an important role.The discrepancy between the results of this paper and Sato′s is attributed to the aerodynamic configurations,especially the change of depth-width ratio.
出处 《振动工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期673-682,共10页 Journal of Vibration Engineering
基金 科技部国家重点基础研究计划(973计划)(2013CB036300) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51078276 91015013) 交通行业重点实验室自主课题(KLWRBMT-04) 国家重点实验室自主课题(SLDRCE10-B-05)
关键词 桥梁 分体箱梁 颤振性能 风嘴形式 动力特性参数 bridges twin-box girder flutter performance fairing form dynamic characteristic parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1项海帆,葛耀君.悬索桥跨径的空气动力极限[J].土木工程学报,2005,38(1):60-70. 被引量:52
  • 2Fumoto K. Large-scale wind tunnel test of super long suspension bridge with slotted one-box girder [A]. Proceedings of the Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering APCWE VI[C]. 2005. 被引量:1
  • 3Larsen A. Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1 624 m suspension bridge across the great belt [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aero- dynamics, 1993,48(2) :261-285. 被引量:1
  • 4Larsen A, Astiz M A. Aeroelastic consideration for the Gibraltar Bridge feasibility study, in: Bridge Aero- dynamics[M]. Larsen Esdahl (eds), Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998 : 165-173. 被引量:1
  • 5Sato H, Ogihara K. Aerodynamic characteristics of slotted box girders [ A]. Proceedings of Bridges into 21st century[C]. 1995:721-728. 被引量:1
  • 6Sato H, Kusuhara S. Aerodynamic characteristics of super long-span bridges with slotted box girder[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerody- namics, 2000,88:297- 306. 被引量:1
  • 7Sato H, Hirahara N. Full aeroelastic model test of a super long-span bridge with slotted box girder[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerody- namics, 2002,90:2 023-2 032. 被引量:1
  • 8杨詠昕,葛耀君,项海帆.大跨度桥梁中央开槽颤振控制效果和机理研究[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(7):74-80. 被引量:26
  • 9杨詠昕,葛耀君,曹丰产.大跨度悬索桥中央开槽箱梁断面的颤振性能[J].中国公路学报,2007,20(3):35-40. 被引量:20
  • 10Yang Yongxin, Ge Yaojun, Xiang Haifan. Aerody- namic flutter control for typical girder sections of long- span cable-supported bridges[J]. Journal of Wind and Structures, 2009,12 (3) : 205-217. 被引量:1

二级参考文献41

  • 1陈政清.斜拉索风雨振现场观测与振动控制[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2005,22(4):5-10. 被引量:61
  • 2邰扣霞,丁大钧.中国桥梁建设新飞跃[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(2):30-40. 被引量:42
  • 3Astiz M A , Andersen E Y. On wind stability of very long spans in connection with a bridge across the Strait of Gibraltar, Strait Crossings [ M ]. Krobeborg (ed.), Balkema, Rotterdam, 1990. 被引量:1
  • 4Larsen A , and Astiz M A. Aeroelastic considerations for the Gibraltar Bridge feasibility study, Bridge Aerodynamics [ M].Larsen & Esdahal (eds.), Balkenm, Rotterdam, 165 -173, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 5Miyata T , Sato H , and Kitagawa M. Design considerations for super structures d the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge [ J]. Ini. Seminar on Utilization of Large Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel, Tsukuka, Japan, 1993. 被引量:1
  • 6Astiz M A. Wind related behaviour of alternative suspension systems [ A]. Proc 15^tg Congress IABSE [ C]. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 7Miyazaki M , et al. Stay-cable systems of long-span suspension bridges for coupled flutter [ A ]. Proc 2^nd EACWE[C], Genova, Italy, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 8Gimsing N J. Cable Supported Bridges [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 9Walshe D E, Twidle G G , and Brown W C. Staticand dynamic measuremerds on a model of a slender bridge with perforated deck [ A]. Proc Int Conf on the Behaviour of Slender Structures [C], London, England, 1977. 被引量:1
  • 10Larsen A , Vejrum T , and Esdahl S. Vortex models for aeroelastic assessment of multi elemem bridge decks, Bridge Aenxlynamics [ M ]. Larsen & Esdahl (eds.), Balkema,Rotterdam, 1998, 313 - 325. 被引量:1

共引文献88

同被引文献66

引证文献3

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部