摘要
目的探讨助产士门诊产前护理干预对妊娠结局的影响。方法选取2013年3月至2015年3月于阜新市第二人民医院就诊的妊娠12-13周正常孕妇资料100例,按随机数字表法将孕妇分为对照组和观察组,各50例。对照组孕妇行常规产科门诊产检,观察组孕妇采取助产士门诊模式,比较两组产妇产后出血、巨大儿、新生儿窒息、分娩方式以及满意度。结果观察组孕妇产后出血、巨大儿、新生儿窒息发生率均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（均P〈0.05）;观察组孕妇的自然分娩率明显高于对照组,剖宫产率明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（均P〈0.05）;观察组孕妇的满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（χ^2=4.891,P〈0.05）。结论助产士门诊产前护理干预能降低巨大儿、剖宫产发生率,保证母婴安全。
Objective To investigate the effect of prenatal care intervention on the outcome of pregnancy.Methods From March 2013 to March 2015 in Fuxin City,the second people＇s Hospital,100 cases of normal pregnant women in 13 cases,according to the random number table method,the patients were divided into control group and nursing group,each of 50 cases.The control group of pregnant women for routine obstetric outpatient production inspection and nursing group of pregnant women take midwife clinic model,were compared between the two groups,postpartum hemorrhage,neonatal asphyxia incidence,mode of delivery and satisfaction.Results Nursing group for pregnant women,postpartum hemorrhage,fetal macrosomia,neonatal asphyxia incidence was significantly lower than that in control group,differences were statistically significant（P0.05）;nursing group of pregnant women and the natural childbirth rate was significantly higher than that of the control group,the rate of cesarean section was significantly lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）;group of pregnant women with nursing satisfaction was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference is statistically significant（χ^2=4.891,P0.05）.Conclusion Prenatal care intervention can reduce the incidence of huge, cesarean section rate, and ensure the safety of maternal and child.
出处
《中国药物经济学》
2015年第10期126-128,共3页
China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
关键词
助产士
门诊
产前
护理干预
孕期指导
妊娠结局
Midwife
Outpatient Department
Prenatal
Nursing intervention
Guidance during pregnancy
Pregnancy outcome
