摘要
海事局对沉没、遇难、搁浅船舶采取强制清污措施产生的燃油清污费用,最高院在宙斯轮一案中认定为非限制性债权。此举既符合法律规定,同时也保障了实践中海事局清污费用的足额偿付。对于燃油清污费用应适用《最高院海事赔偿限制司法解释》第17条1款和《最高院油污司法解释》第20条规定认定为非限制性债权。同时生效不久的《内罗毕国际残骸清除公约》对于我国立法具有重要借鉴意义。
Maritime safety administration of sinking, killed, stranded ship compulsory clean-up measures to produce fuel oil clean-up costs, after the Supreme Court Zeus rounds a case as a nonrestrictive creditor＇ s rights, it is conform to the law, but also to ensure the maritime safety administration in the practice of sewage disposal cost of pay of full specified amount. For fuel oil clean-up fees shall apply for maritime claims limit judicial interpretation from the supreme people＇ s court ＂the 17 th paragraph 1 and the oil from the supreme people＇ s court judicial interpretation＂ stipulated in article 20 as unrestricted claims. Take effect at the same time soon the Nairobi convention on international debris removal has important significance for China＇ s legislation.
出处
《青岛远洋船员职业学院学报》
2015年第3期6-9,共4页
Journal of Qingdao Ocean Shipping Mariners College
关键词
责任限制
燃油清污费用
限制性债权
the limitation of liability
clean-up costs of bunker
the limitation of liability for maritime claims
