期刊文献+

不同干预方式及干预时机对急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死伴多支病变的临床效果研究 被引量:4

Research on the Clinical Effect of Different Interventions and Operational Time of Treatment for Non-ST Segment Acute Elevated Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估肌钙蛋白I(c Tn I)转归前后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(coronary artery bypass grafting,CABG)治疗急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死(non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction,NSTEMI)的有效性及安全性。方法:入选2008年1月1日至2013年4月30日就诊于我院并接受PCI或CABG治疗的NSTEMI患者329例,分为c Tn I转归前PCI干预组(A组)、c Tn I转归前CABG干预组(B组)、c Tn I转归后PCI干预组(C组)和c Tn I转归后CABG干预组(D组)。计算和比较各组的临床终点事件的发生率,再灌注策略对临床终点事件的优势比(OR)。结果:四组患者的完全血运重建率比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),B、C、D组显著高于A组(P〈0.05),而B、C、D组之间比较无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。术后24个月,再次血运重建率:A组12.9%和B组3.4%(OR=3.82,95%CI:1.03~16.60),A组12.9%和C组5.1%(OR=2.55,95%CI:1.29~6.61);MACCE事件发生率:A组14.1%和C组5.9%(OR=2.38,95%CI:1.15~5.79),以上结果比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:c Tn I转归后行PCI治疗NSTEMI伴多支病变患者较c Tn I转归前PCI更有利于减少MACCE事件和再次血运重建的发生,c Tn I转归前行CABG术在降低血运重建发生率方面较优于PCI治疗。 Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PCI before and after cardiac troponin(c Tn I) returned to normal and CABG in the treatment of non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction(NSTEMI). Methods: From Jan 1 2008 to Apr 302013, 329 patients receiving PCI or CABG in our hospital were screened and enrolled into this study. The patients were divided into four groups: PCI before c Tn I returned to normal(A group), CABG before c Tn I returned to normal(B group), PCI after c Tn I returned to normal(C group) and CABG after c Tn I returned to normal(D group). The incidences of clinical events of four groups were compared and the odds ratio(OR)of efficacy and safety endpoints were calculated. Results: There are difference in completeness of reveascularisation among the four groups(P〈0.05), The percentages of complete reveascularisation of group B, C and D were significantly higher than that of group A(P〈0.05), however, no significant difference was found among the three groups(P〉0.05). At 24 th month after operation, the percentages of complete reveascularisation were 12.9% in group A and 3.4% in group B(OR=3.82, 95% CI: 1.03~16.60), 12.9% in group A and 5.1% in group C(OR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.29~6.61), the incidence of MACCE were 14.1% in group A and 5.9% in group C(OR=2.38, 95% CI: 1.15~5.79)(P〈0.05). Conclusion: For NSTEMI patients with multivessel disease, PCI after c Tn I return to normal could be beneficial to reduce the revascularization rates and incidence of MACCE compared with PCI before c Tn I return to normal, the CABG treatment is was superior to PCI before c Tn I return to normal in reducing the rates of revascularization.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2015年第28期5535-5538,5585,共5页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 青岛市公共领域科技支撑计划项目(11-2-3-2-(11)-nsh)
关键词 急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死 冠状动脉旁路移植术 手术时机 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 肌钙蛋白I 多支病变 Non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) CABG Operational time PCI CTn I Multivessel disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Executive summary: heartdisease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the AmericanHeart Association[J].Circulation, 2012,125(1): 188-197. 被引量:1
  • 2White HD, Chew DP. Acute myocardial infarction [J].Lancet, 2008,372(9638): 570-584. 被引量:1
  • 3Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, N0rgaard BL, et al. Mortality rates in patientswith ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction:observations from an unselected cohort [J].Eur Heart J, 2005, 26(1):18-26. 被引量:1
  • 42012 Writing Committee Members, Jneid H, Anderson JL, et al. 2012ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management ofpatients with unstable angina/Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction(updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update):a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/AmericanHeart Association Task Force on practice guidelines [J].Circulation,2012,126(7): 875-910. 被引量:1
  • 5DeWood MA, Stifter WF, Simpson CS, et al. Coronary arteriographicfindings soon after non-Q-wave myocar-dial infarction [J].N Engl JMed, 1986,315(7):417-423. 被引量:1
  • 6王爱斌,胡雅琴.急性心肌梗死患者肌钙蛋白I检测的价值分析[J].甘肃医药,2013,32(1):62-63. 被引量:3
  • 7池一凡,孙忠东,侯文明,牛兆倬,孙龙,孙勇,生伟,林明山.急性心肌梗死外科治疗的临床效果与手术时机探讨[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2011,18(6):531-535. 被引量:8
  • 8Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronaryintervention versus coronaiy-artery bypass grafting for severecoronary artery disease[J].N Engl J Med, 2009,360(10): 961-972. 被引量:1
  • 9Booth J, Clayton T, Pepper J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial ofcoronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronaryintervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease:six-year follow-up from the Stent or Surgery trial (SO^) [J]:Circulation, 2008,118: 381-388. 被引量:1
  • 10Ben-Gal Y, Moses JW, Mehran R, et al. Surgical versus percutaneousrevascularization for multivessel disease in patients with acutecoronary syndromes: analysis from the ACUITY (AcuteCatheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial [J]:JACC Cardiovasc interv, 2010, 3(10): 1059-1067. 被引量:1

二级参考文献32

  • 1于子翔,马依彤.非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征介入治疗策略选择[J].心血管病学进展,2009,30(6):945-949. 被引量:1
  • 2赵明中,胡大一,姜立清,吴炀,朱天刚,郝恒健,张立晶,霍勇,王明生.早期有创干预对高危无ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征近远期预后的影响[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(10):737-740. 被引量:9
  • 3吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:174
  • 4陈灏珠.实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009. 被引量:613
  • 5Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Assessing risk of bias in included stud- ies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.0[updated February 2008; Part 2 Chapter 8.In:The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008. Chichester, UK:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 6Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronaryartery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet, 1999, 354(9180): 708-715. 被引量:1
  • 7Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulas LA, et al.Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344(25): 1879-1887. 被引量:1
  • 8Spacek R, Widimsky P, Straka Z, et al. Value of first day angiography/angioplasty in evolving Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: an open multicenter randomized trial. The VINO Study. Eur Heart J, 2002, 23(3): 230-238. 被引量:1
  • 9Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non- ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet, 2002, 360(9335): 743-751. 被引量:1
  • 10de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, et al. Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes(ICTUS)Investigators. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(11): 1095-1104. 被引量:1

共引文献16

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部