摘要
裁判文书网上公开是实现司法公开的重要方式之一,有关司法解释为裁判文书网上公开确定了全面性、及时性等要求,并力图实现文书公开与当事人隐私权保护的微妙平衡。实证研究显示,部分地方法院在网上公开裁判文书时,存在公开率不足、有选择性地公开裁判文书、公开频率较低、裁判文书自生效至公开的时间间隔过长等问题。同时,对于司法解释为平衡裁判文书公开与当事人隐私权保护所规定的技术处理措施,部分地方法院也未能很好地贯彻。
Online disclosure of referee documents is an important way to realize judicial transparency. Relevant judicial interpretation identified the requirements of comprehensiveness and timeliness, and tries to make balance between disclosure of referee documents and protection of party＇s right of privacy. Empirical study shows that some problems exist when some courts disclose referee documents online, such as low disclosure rate, selective disclosure, and low disclosure frequency. At the same time, some courts failed to implement the technical solutions by which the judicial interpretation tries to make balance between online disclosure of referee documents and protection of party＇s right of privacy.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2015年第3期59-66,共8页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
关键词
裁判文书
网上公开
隐私权保护
实证研究
referee documents
disclosure online
protection right of privacy
empirical study
