期刊文献+

SGA和NRS-2002量表对维持性血液透析患者营养状况的评估效果 被引量:8

Effect of SGA and NRS-2002 scale on nutritional status assessment in maintenance hemodialysis patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察两种营养评价量表对维持性血液透析患者营养状况评估的效果。方法:对80例于我院血液净化中心行血液透析的患者运用患者主观全面评价法(subjective global assessment,SGA)和营养风险筛查2002(nutrition risk screening 2002,NRS-2002)进行营养状态评估,同时评价两种方法与血液学指标的关联性。结果:SGA评价结果为营养不良者占68.75%,NRS-2002评价结果为营养不良者占42.50%。两种评价方法之间及两种评价方法与血清学营养指标之间均有显著相关性(P<0.05)。结论:SGA评定量表和NRS-2002评分系统均能有效地评估维持性血液透析患者的营养状况,将SGA、NRS-2002与实验室检测指标联合应用更有助于提高长期透析患者营养不良诊断率。 Objective: To observe the effect of two kinds of nutritional assessment scales on the nutritional status in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Methods: Eighty cases of maintenance hemodialysis patients in our hospital blood purification center had been collected. Subjective global assessment( subjective global assessment,SGA)and nutritional risk screening 2002( Nutrition Risk Screening 2002. NRS-2002) were used to evaluate the nutritional status. The relevance between the two scales and the index of blood were evaluated also. Results: The results for malnutrition were 68. 75% by SGA and 42. 50% by NRS-2002. There was a significant correlation between the two methods and the serum nutrition indicators( P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion: SGA assessment scale and NRS-2002 scoring system can effectively assess the nutritional status of maintenance hemodialysis patients.Combined the SGA and NRS-2002 with laboratory detection index is more useful to improve malnutrition diagnosis rate of long-term maintenance hemodialysis patients.
作者 吴志银
出处 《现代医学》 2015年第9期1140-1143,共4页 Modern Medical Journal
关键词 血液透析 营养状况 评估方法 hemodialysis nutritional status assessment method
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1叶小英.优质护理服务在长期血液透析营养不良患者中的应用效果[J].护理实践与研究,2013,10(9):53-54. 被引量:7
  • 2卓银霞,汪应霞,陈桂英,杜丽.维持性血液透析患者营养状况及其影响因素调查分析[J].护理管理杂志,2014,14(3):169-170. 被引量:21
  • 3KALANTAR- ZADEH K, KLEINER M, DUNNE E, et al. A modified quantitative subjective global assessment of nutrition for dialysis patients [ J ]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1999, 14(7) :1732. 被引量:1
  • 4VARKER KA, ANSEL A, AUKERMAN G, et al. Review of complementary and alternative medicine and selected nutra- ceuticals :background for a pilot study on nutrigenomic inter- vention in patients with advanced cancer [ J 1. Altern Ther Health Med, 2012,18 ( 2 ) :26- 34. 被引量:1
  • 5BAUER J, CAPRA S, FERGUSON M. Use of the scored pa- tientgenerated subjective global assessment ( PG- SGA ) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer [ J ]. Eur J Clin Nutr,2002,56 ( 8 ) : 779- 785. 被引量:1
  • 6丁连安著..营养与胃肠道疾病[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:207.
  • 7KONDRUP J, RASMUSSEN H H, HAMBERG O, et al. Nutri- tional risk screening (NRS2002) :a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials [ J ]. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22(3) :321-336. 被引量:1
  • 8KIDGO Work Group. Kdigo clinical practice guideline for anemiain chronic kidney disease [ J ]. Kidney Int, 2012,2(Suppl) : 288-291. 被引量:1
  • 9WENDLAND B E. Nutritional guidelines for persons infected with the hepatitis C virus:a review of the literature [ J ]. Can J Diet Pract Res ,2000,62 ( 1 ) :7-15. 被引量:1
  • 10McMILLAN, D C. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer [ J ]. Cur Opi Clin Nutr Met Care, 2009,12 ( 3 ) : 223- 226. 被引量:1

二级参考文献29

共引文献35

同被引文献60

引证文献8

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部