摘要
船舶买卖合同中的所有权保留条款应具有物权效力,才符合实务的需要,具有现实的价值。一些学者根据《中华人民共和国物权法》和《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》的规定认为,当事人关于船舶所有权变动的约定不再具有物权效力。从法价值、特别法与一般法适用原则和文义解释的角度看,该观点值得商榷,司法解释相关条款应置于其全文及相关法律规范构成的整体语境下适用,不能简单、武断地否认所有权保留条款的物权效力。
The ownership reservation clause in the contract of sale of ships should bear the real rights effect to meet the need of practice. Some scholars, according to the provisions of the Property Law of the People＇ s Republic of China, and the Inter- pretation on the Application of Laws in the Trial of the Contract of Sale by the Supreme Court, hold the opinion that the agree- ments on the transfer of ownership no longer have real rights effect. The paper, from the view-point of legal value, of principles about the application of special provisions and common provisions, and of wording interpretation, rebuts the above-mentioned opinion, and points out that the judicial interpretation should be applied in the context of the legal regime. The real rights effect of the ownership reservation clause should not be denied arbitrarily and simply.
出处
《中国海商法研究》
CSSCI
2015年第3期22-28,共7页
Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
基金
辽宁省教育厅2013年人文社会科学重点研究基地专项项目"海商法与民法的规则冲突与契合"(ZJ2013020)
关键词
船舶买卖
所有权保留条款
物权变动
物权效力
sale of ships
ownership reservation clause
transference of real rights
real rights effect
