期刊文献+

10%氯化钠在Ⅲ期压疮清创期的应用研究 被引量:6

Research on the Application of 10% Sodium Chloride for Stage-Ⅲ Pressure Ulcer Debridement
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索10%氯化钠在Ⅲ期压疮清创期的作用。方法将2011年1月-2014年12月门诊和住院部收治的院外压疮和难免性压疮,按照压疮分期为Ⅲ期、表面黄期、细菌学培养阳性提示感染的压疮伤口患者68例。将其随机分对照组和试验组,对照组使用传统换药法进行处理,试验组选用10%氯化钠进行处理。直至肉芽新鲜,培养细菌学阴性,提示清创结束,进入肉芽生长期和爬皮期。在清创换药时间、伤口渗液、伤口异味、肉芽生长情况、疼痛评分、费用情况等方面收集数据进行比较。结果对照组清创时间为18~32 d,平均(22.4±10.8)d,试验组清创时间5~13 d,平均(11.6±4.0)d,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);伤口渗液方面对照组平均(6.70±2.87)分,试验组平均(3.65±1.23)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);异味情况方面对照组平均(2.74±1.62)分,试验组平均(1.26±0.51)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。对照组平均费用支出(975.00±10.29)元,试验组平均费用支出(626.00±8.18)元,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。疼痛评分差异性不明显。结论 10%浓氯化钠应用于Ⅲ期压疮的清创,可缩短清创时间,促进肉芽生长、效果明显。同时可减轻患者经济负担,值得临床推广。 Objective To explore the application of 10% sodium chloride for stage-Ⅲ pressure ulcer debridement. Methods According to the standard, 68 stage-Ⅲ pressure ulcer cases were selected from January 2011 to December 2014. All the patients had yellow surface and positive bacterium cultivation suggesting wound infection. They were randomly divided into control group and trial group. The control group used traditional treatment for debridement, while the trial group used 10% sodium chloride, until the end of debridement where the granulation became fresh and bacterium cultivation negative. Then we compared these two groups in terms of debridement time, wound drainage, wound smell, granulation growth, pain score and cost. Results The control group debridement time was 18-32 days, averaging(22.4±10.8) days, and the trial group debridement time was 5-13 days, averaging(11.6±4.0) days(P〈0.05). The control group wound drainage ratings score was 6.70±2.87, while the trial group wound drainage ratings score was 3.65±1.23(P〈0.05). In terms of the wound smell, the control group had a score of 2.74±1.62, and the score for the experimental group was 1.26±0.51(P〈0.05). The average cost of the control group was(975.00±10.29) yuan, while the experimental group was(626.00±8.18) yuan(P〈0.05). Conclusion The application of 10% sodium chloride for stage-Ⅲ pressure ulcer debridement can shorten debridement time, promote the growth of granulation and reduce the economic burden, which is worth clinical promotion.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2015年第10期1818-1821,共4页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 压疮 10%氯化钠 清创 Pressure ulcer 10% sodium chloride Debridement
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP/EPUAP). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline[M].Washington, DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2009.56. 被引量:1
  • 2National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. 2007 National pressure ulcer staging defintion[J]. Would Council Enterostomal Therapists J, 2007, 27(3): 30-31. 被引量:1
  • 3Hurd T, Posnett I. Point prevalence of wounds in a sample of acute hospitals in Canada[J]. Int Wound J, 2009, 6(4): 287-293. 被引量:1
  • 4Lahmann NA, Dassen T, Poehler A, et al. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates from 2002 to 2008 in Germann long-term care facilities[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2010, 22(2): 152-1. 被引量:1
  • 5蒋琪霞,李晓华,王建东.医院获得性压疮流行病学特征及预防研究进展[J].中国护理管理,2014,14(7):676-679. 被引量:46
  • 6蒋琪霞,管晓萍,苏纯音,郭秀君,陈月娟,朱亚君,贾静,柏素萍,张瑞,刘莉,徐玲,吴乐燕,刘云.综合性医院压疮现患率多中心联合调研[J].中国护理管理,2013,13(1):26-30. 被引量:225
  • 7蒋琪霞,刘云,管晓萍,苏纯音,郭秀君,陈月娟,朱亚君,贾静,柏素萍,张瑞,刘莉,徐玲,吴乐燕.住院患者压疮现患率的多中心研究[J].医学研究生学报,2013,26(12):1298-1303. 被引量:82
  • 8Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review[J]. JAMA, 2006, 296(8): 974-984. 被引量:1
  • 9Defloor T, De Bacquer D, Grypdonck MH. The effect of various combinations of turning and pressure reducing devices on the incidence of pressure ulcers[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2005, 42(1): 37-46. 被引量:1
  • 10刘春雨,张庆玲.压疮护理研究新进展[J].西部医学,2012,24(7):1421-1422. 被引量:12

二级参考文献181

共引文献472

同被引文献86

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部