期刊文献+

消失中的审判——当代美国民事诉讼的最突出现象及其启示 被引量:3

The Vanishing Trial: The Most Prominent phenomenon in the Contemporary American Civil Procedure and Its revelation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "消失中的审判"是当代美国民事诉讼中最引人注目的现象。这一现象并不是单一因素的促成,而是多重力量合力作用的结果。这些合力的结合使得审判消失的趋势固化,从而在短期内不大可能逆转。"消失中的审判"作为一种趋势,背后还蕴涵着一些值得深究的理论话题:法官角色的变迁、司法功能的弱化、审判模式的变革、程序效率与公平的辩证关系、法律程序对实体法的架空、ADR对诉讼的冲击、司法公开性的失落等。 "The vanishing trial" is the most striking phenomenon in the Contemporary American civil proce- dure. This phenomenon can' t be contributed to a single factor, but the joint effect of multiple forces. The combina- tion of these forces make the trend rigid, and it is unlikely to be reversed in the short term. However, there are some theoretical topics that could be worth studying behind the phenomenon, such as the role of judges, judicial func- tions, the relationship between the efficiency and fairness of the procedure, the erosion of substantive law, the im- pact of ADR on litigation, judicial openness, and so on.
作者 李少波
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期113-118,共6页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 审判 证据开示 案件管理 法治 trial discovery casemanagement rule of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Patrick E. Higginbotham, So Why Do We Call Them Trial Courts? [J]. 55 SMU L. Rev. 1405 (2002). 被引量:1
  • 2Steven S. Gensler & Lee H. Rosenthal, The Reappearing Judge[ J]. 61 Kan. L. Rev. 849 (2013). 被引量:1
  • 3Stephen Subrin & Thomas O. Main, The Fourth Era of American Civil Procedure[J]. 162 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1839, 2014. 被引量:1
  • 4王泽鉴..英美法导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:321页.
  • 5John H. Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States[ J]. 122 Yale Law Journal 522 (2012). 被引量:1
  • 6骆永兴.美国ADR的发展与影响[J].湖北社会科学,2013(2):154-158. 被引量:7
  • 7Judith Resnik, Whither and Whether Adjudication? [J].86 B.U.L. REV. 1101 (2006). 被引量:1
  • 8Laurence H. Silberman, Will Lawyering Strangle Democratic Capitalism? [J].REGULATION, Mar. -Apr. 1978. 被引量:1
  • 9Marc Galanter, The Turn Against Law: The Recoil Against Expanding Accountability[ J]. 81 TEX. L. REV. 285 (2002). 被引量:1
  • 10Samuel R. Gross & Kent D. Syverud, Don' t Try: Civil Jury Verdicts in a System Geared to Settlement[J]. 44 UCLA L. REV. 1 (1996). 被引量:1

二级参考文献7

共引文献6

同被引文献21

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部