期刊文献+

论美国征收条款及对我国的启示 被引量:6

On the U.S. Taking Clause and the Enlightenment Towards China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 征收条款自《自由大宪章》以来经历了500多年的历史发展,最终在18世纪末以宪法第5修正案的形式落户美国宪法。第一次在美国联邦宪法层面提及"正当法律程序"、"公共使用"和"公平补偿",美国法院以此为依据游刃有余地处理各类征收案件,对政府管制性立法进行司法审查,最大限度实现政府权力与私人财产权的衡平。面对当下我国征收征用所引发的一系列社会问题,可当借鉴美国经验,在裁决征收征用案件时,坚持程序性正当法律程序与实质性正当法律程序并重,通过概括与列举方式对"公共利益"进行界定,建立公平市场价值与完全补偿相结合的补偿标准,缓解政府与财产所有者的矛盾,及时高效地解决征收征用问题。 The Taking Clause comes through more than five hundred years of development of history from the Magna Carta , it settled down the Constitution of the United States finally through the way of the Fifth Amendment at the end of (the) 18th century. The clause refers to"due process of law","public use" ,"just compensation" in the Constitution of the United States level for the first time , the U. S. court deals with all kinds of taking cases easily ac- cording to the clause and implement judicial review to the regulatory legislations formulated by the government in or- der to achieve the balance between the governmental power and private property rights farthest. Faced with a series of social problems which the taking and expropriation bring about now , we should draw the American experience , insist that the equal stress should be laid on the procedural due process of law and substantive due process of law, define the"public use" by the means of summarization and particularization and establish the compensational standard of combining the just vendibility with full compensation so as to relieve the contradiction between the government and the owner of property and solve the problems of taking and expropriation timely and effectively.
作者 杨显滨
机构地区 上海大学法学院
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期104-112,共9页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 2015年上海高校青年教师培养资助计划项目"美国宪法征收条款及对我国的启示问题研究"的阶段性研究成果
关键词 征收条款 正当程序 公共使用 公平补偿 the taking clause due process public use just compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Andrew S. Gold. Regulatory Takings and Original Intent:The Direct , Physical Takings Thesis Goes Too Far [ J ]. The Journal of American Uni- versity Law Review, 1999,1 81. 被引量:1
  • 2Bret Boyce. Property as a Natural Right and as Conventional Right in Constitutional Law[ J ]. Loyola of Los Angeles International&Comparative Law Review,2007,201. 被引量:1
  • 3[美]威廉‘迈克尔·特雷纳.第5修正案公平补偿条款的起源及其原意[J].毕洪海译.耶鲁大学法律杂志,1985,94. 被引量:1
  • 4Supra note 3. 被引量:1
  • 5Richard L. Perry . Sources of Our Liberties: Documentary Origins of Individual Liberties in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights [ M ]. New York - New York University Press, 1972. 被引量:1
  • 6王蕾.浅谈美国宪政中的实体性正当程序[J].科技视界,2012(26):92-93. 被引量:1
  • 7付瑶著..契约自由的宪法保护 以美国宪法史上的“洛克纳时代”(1897-1937)为中心[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012:276.
  • 8[美]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军,译.北京:法律出版社,2011:177-178. 被引量:4
  • 9廖正胜著..美国宪法导论[M],2007:254.
  • 10李进之,等.美国财产法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998.201. 被引量:2

二级参考文献120

共引文献479

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部