摘要
目的对比分析使用高频电波(LEEP)刀治疗与常规治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2011年11月至2013年12月收治入院并经临床探查与病理检查能够确诊的慢性宫颈炎患者196例,随机分为实验组100例和对照组96例。实验组患者采取LEEP刀治疗,对照组采用常规电烫治疗,9周后复查。观察比较两组患者的临床疗效和术后的临床表征(阴道排液量、排液时间、阴道出血量、出血时间)。结果实验组患者显效83例,有效17例;对照组显效64例,有效16例,无效8例。实验组总有效率为100%,对照组为83.3%,实验组治疗效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01);两组患者术后临床表征比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.01)。结论使用LEEP刀治疗慢性宫颈炎的临床疗效显著,总有效率高,是一种高效安全的慢性宫颈炎治疗方法,值得在临床治疗中推广应用。
Objective To compare and analysis the clinical effect of LEEP knife and conventional therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic cervicitis. Methods From November 2011 to December 2013,196 patients with chronic cervicitis who were diagnosed by the discovery and clinical pathology were selected and randomly divided into two groups,the experimental group（ 100 cases） and the control group（ 96 cases）. Patients in the experimental group were treated by LEEP knife,and patients in the control group were given the conventional mining perm treatment,and they were reviewed nine weeks later. The clinical efficacy and clinical characterization of postoperative（ vaginal discharge fluid volume,drain time,vaginal bleeding,bleeding time）of the two groups were observed and compared. Results In the experimental group,83 cases were markedly effective,effective in 17 cases; In the control group,64 cases were markedly effective,effective in 16 patients,8 cases were invalid. The total effective rate of experimental group was 100%,and the total effective rate of control group was 83. 3%,the curative effect of experimental group was significantly better than that of control group（ P〈0. 01）; The postoperative clinical characterization of the two groups had no statistical significance difference（ P〉0. 01）. Conclusion There is a high total effective rate of LEEP knife in the treatment of chronic cervicitis,is an efficient and safe method,and worthy of promotion in the clinical treatment applications.
出处
《临床医学》
CAS
2015年第8期39-40,共2页
Clinical Medicine
