期刊文献+

BSID-Ⅲ认知量表在中国应用初探 被引量:11

Initiative study on the applicability of BSID-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的检验贝莉婴幼儿发育量表Ⅲ(The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development,BSID-Ⅲ)认知量表的信度和效度,探讨其在我国引进和使用的可行性。方法翻译、回译BSID-Ⅲ,在无锡、太原、郴州三个研究点,共1 440名16d^42个月儿童进行BSID-Ⅲ认知量表测试。结果重测信度为0.946;内部信度分析,Cronbach'α系数为0.987。校标效度Pearson相关系数为0.93。结论 BSID-Ⅲ认知量表有较好的信度和效度,临床上可以使用该量表评定儿童的认知水平,在我国范围内引进和应用是可行和必要的。 Objective To explore the applicability of BSID-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale in China to test the reliability and validi- ty of BSID-Ⅲ. Methods BSID-Ⅲ were translated into Chinese,and back translated into English. 1 440 infants were ran- domly selected in Wuxi,Taiyuan and Chenzhou,aged from 16 days to 42 months. Cognitive tests were performed in all in- fants by BSID-Ⅲ. Results Test-retest reliability was 0. 946. The internal consistent reliability,Cronbach coefficient was 0. 987. Spearman coefficients of validity was 0.93. Conclusion BS1D-Ⅲ Cognitive Scale shows good reliability and validi- ty. It is feasible to assess the cognitive development of infants and toddlers in China. It is practicable and necessary to use it.
出处 《中国儿童保健杂志》 CAS 2015年第10期1041-1043,共3页 Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金 江苏省卫生计生委2014-2015年度预防医学科研课题(Y2015069) 苏州市社会发展科技计划(SS201329)
关键词 贝莉婴幼儿发育量表-Ⅲ 认知发育 信度 效度 Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Ⅲ cognitive development reliability l validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Weiss LG. Bayley-l Clinical Use and Interpretation'[M].US,American Academic Press,2010. 被引量:1
  • 2Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development [M]. Third edition. San Antonio TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc,2005. 被引量:1
  • 3Nancy B. Bayley-]][ scales of infant and toddler development [M]. US,American Academic Press,2013. Bos AF. Bayley-II or Bayley-lll . 被引量:1
  • 4What do the scores tell us [J]. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2013, 55(11) :978-979. 被引量:1
  • 5Lowe JR, Erickson SJ, Schrader R, et al. Comparison of the Bayley II mental developmental index and the Bayley [II cog- nitive scale: are we measuring the same thing? [J]. Aacta Paediatrica, 2012,101 (2), e55-58. 被引量:1
  • 6Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, et al. Underesti- mation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-ll[ scale [J]. Archives of Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine, 2010, 164(4), 352-356. 被引量:1
  • 7Morse SB, Zheng H, Tang Y, et al. Early school-age out- comes of late preterm in{ants[J]. Pediatrics, 2009,123 (4) : 622-629. 被引量:1
  • 8Chyi LJ, Lee HC, Hintz SR, et al. School outcomes of late preterm infants special needs and challenges for infants born at 32 to 36 weeks gestation[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 153 ( 1 ) : 25-11. 被引量:1
  • 9Milne S,McDonald J,Comino EJ,et al. The use of the BSID scales of infant and toddler development HI with clinical popu]ations:A preliminary exploration[J]. Physical Occur pational Therapy Pediatrics, 2012,32 (I) x 24-33. 被引量:1
  • 10Gurka MJ, LoCasale-Crouch J, Blackman JA. Long-term cognition, achievement, socioemotional, and behavioral de- velopment of healthy late-preterm infants[J]. Archives of Pediatrics g Adolescent Medicine, 2010, 164 (6) 525-532. 被引量:1

同被引文献104

  • 1黄亨烨,于广军.婴幼儿早期神经发育评估诊断量表的综述[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2023,31(2):162-166. 被引量:6
  • 2杨丽清,袁芩.20项新生儿行为神经测定评估新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的预后[J].实用临床医学(江西),2007,8(3):93-94. 被引量:9
  • 3丁艳华,徐秀,冯玲英,李慧蓉.贝莉婴儿发育量表-Ⅱ在我国的引进和使用初探[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2007,15(2):147-148. 被引量:32
  • 4王慧琴,曲成毅,赵树平,边红,丁培玲,杨金社,段淑红,杨巧红,李锐,张永和,刘耀斌,蔚芳.Griffith精神发育量表在山西0-7岁儿童中的修订[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(10):700-703. 被引量:8
  • 5Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, et ah Underestimationof Developmental Delay by the New Bayley -HI Scale [ J ]. ArchPediatr Adolesc Med, 2010, 164(4):352-356. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics. 2010. 20. 被引量:1
  • 6Spencer- Smith MM, Spittle AJ, Lee KJ, et al. Bayley-IIICognitive and Language Scales in Preterm Children [ J/OL].Pediatrics,2015, 135 (5) :el258-el265. [2016-02-01 ]. http://pediatrics. aappublications. org/ cgi/ pmidlookup? view =long&pmid =25896835 DOI : 10. 1542/peds. 2014-3039. 被引量:1
  • 7Milne S,McDonald J,Comino EJ. The use of the Bayley scales ofthe infant and toddler development ID with clinical populations : apreliminary exploration [ J ]. Phys Occup Ther Pediatri,2012 , 32(1) :24-33. DOI:10.3109/01942638.2011.592572. 被引量:1
  • 8Deroma L, Bin M, Tognin V,et al. Interrater reliability of theBayley IE test in the Italian Northern-Adriatic Cohort II [ J ].Epidemiol Prev,2013, 37(4-5) :297-302. 被引量:1
  • 9Jary S, Whitelaw A, Walloe L, et al. Comparison of Bayley-2 andBayley-3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatalencephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia[ J]. Dev Med ChildNeurol, 2013, 55 ( 11 ) : 1053-1059. DOI: 10. 1111/dmcn.12208. 被引量:1
  • 10Moore T,Johnson S, Haider S, et al. Relationship between testscores using the secondand third editions of the Bayley Scales inextremely preterm children[ J]. J Pediatr, 2012, 160(4) : 553-558. DOI: 10.1016/j. jpeds. 2011.09.047. 被引量:1

引证文献11

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部