摘要
目的探讨出血性中风病"一分为三"证候的分布规律,并与1994年国家中医药管理局制定的"中风病辨证诊断标准"(简称"94标准")进行对比。方法对符合纳入标准的127例出血性中风病3期(急性期、恢复期、后遗症期)患者,分别同时进行两种方法的辨证:按"94标准"辨证为对照组,运用"一分为三"的辨证方法(辨阴证、阳证、阴阳错杂证)进行辨证设为试验组,并于入组后第1、3、8、14天进行辨证观察研究。结果 "一分为三"辨证分型与"94标准"辨证分型基本吻合。结论使用"一分为三"辨证可执简驭繁概括出血性中风病"94标准"所辨的6种基本证型。
Objective To combine classification method of One Divided into Three Syndrome Types with ＂Stroke disease syndrome Diagnostic criteria＂（1994 version）which stated by administration of traditional Chinese medicine for hemorrhagic stroke,and to explore the distributive regularity of the One Divided into Three Syndrome Types. Methods 127 hemorrhagic Stroke patients were divided into the experimental group and the control group. Patients in the experimental group were classified according to the＂one divides into three＂dialectical method（identified Yin Syndrome,Yang,Yin and Yang mixed Syndrome）,and the control group were classified according to the＂standard 94＂method. Results were observed on days of1 st,3rd,8th and 14 th. Results The＂Three＂Syndromes and＂94 standard＂syndrome type were basically consistent. Conclusion＂Three＂syndromes can be summarized the＂94standard＂more concise for hemorrhagic stroke patients in clinic.
出处
《云南中医学院学报》
2015年第5期78-81,共4页
Journal of Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
云南省卫生厅项目(2010NS102)
关键词
出血性中风病
一分为三辨证方法
辨证研究
hemorrhagic stroke
＂one divides into three＂dialectical method
the research of syndrome differentiation
