期刊文献+

基于多等级方案成对比较的决策方法 被引量:11

Decision method based on pairwise comparison of alternatives on multiple grades
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了解决现有的方案两两比较方法一般构建单等级上的比较关系,且不能同时表达多种不同偏好关系的不足,提出一种新的基于多等级方案成对比较的决策方法,构建方案集上基于对称框架的分布式多等级偏好关系.通过设定各等级的得分值,计算分布式偏好关系的得分矩阵,并基于此矩阵构建成对优化模型,求取各方案的优先权区间,进而产生决策结果.将所提出的方法应用于某制造企业云服务供应商的选择问题,验证了所提出方法的应用性和有效性. To address the shortcomings of existing methods of pairwise comparison of alternatives generally constructing comparison relation on one grade rather than expressing a variety of different preference relations simultaneously, a new decision method based on pairwise comparison of alternatives on multiple grades is proposed. In the method, a symmetrical framework based distributed preference relation(DPR) on multiple grades is constructed on a set of alternatives. Through giving scores of grades in the framework, the score matrix of the DPR is calculated and used to construct a pair of optimization models to obtain the priority interval of any alternative, which is further applied to generate decision results. A selection problem of cloud service providers in a manufacturing enterprise is solved by using the proposed method, which verifies its applicability and effectiveness.
作者 付超 侯震
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1828-1834,共7页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71201043) 教育部人文社科基金项目(12YJC630046) 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1408085MG136)
关键词 方案成对比较 分布式偏好关系 多等级 优先权区间 得分矩阵 pairwise comparison of alternatives distributed preference relation multiple grades priority interval score matrix
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Saaty T L, Peniwati K. Group decision making: Drawing out and reconciling differences[M]. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 2008: 63-94. 被引量:1
  • 2Herrera- Viedma E, Herrera F, Chic1ana F, et al. Some issues on consistency offuzzy preference relations[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2004, 154(1): 98-109. 被引量:1
  • 3Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2003, 18: 837-852. 被引量:1
  • 4Xu Z S. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(11): 2363-2379. 被引量:1
  • 5Behret H. Group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 70: 33-43. 被引量:1
  • 6Zeng S Z, Su W H, Sun L. A method based on similarity measures for interactive group decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(10/11): 6909-6917. 被引量:1
  • 7Qi Yue,Zhiping Fan,Lihua Shi.New approach to determine the priorities from interval fuzzy preference relations[J].Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics,2011,22(2):267-273. 被引量:7
  • 8宋光兴,杨德礼.AHP判断矩阵与模糊判断矩阵相互转化方法[J].大连理工大学学报,2003,43(4):535-539. 被引量:38
  • 9Ohnishi S, Yamanoi T, Imai H. A fuzzy representation for non-additive weights of AHP[C]. IEEE Int Conf on Fuzzy Systems. Taipei: IEEE, 2011: 672-675. 被引量:1
  • 10Li Z W, Wen G Q, Han Y. Decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and its algorithm[J]. J of Computational Analysis and Applications, 2014, 17(4): 620-631. 被引量:1

二级参考文献56

  • 1魏毅强,刘进生,王绪柱.不确定型AHP中判断矩阵的一致性概念及权重[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994,14(4):16-22. 被引量:191
  • 2兰继斌,徐扬,霍良安,刘家忠.模糊层次分析法权重研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(9):107-112. 被引量:310
  • 3Yoon K. The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis : A practical approach [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1989, 40(7): 681- 686. 被引量:1
  • 4Huynh V-N, Nakamori Y, Tu-Bao Ho, et al. Multiple- attribute decision making under uncertainty: The evi- dential reasoning approach revisited[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Part A) : Systems and Humans, 1EEE Transactions, 2006, 36(4): 804-822. 被引量:1
  • 5Bryson N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J]. EurJOperRes, 1996, 96(3) : 379-386. 被引量:1
  • 6Xu D L, Yang J B, Wang Y M. The evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under interval uncertainty[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2006, 174(3): 1914-1943. 被引量:1
  • 7Guo M, Yang J B, Chin K S, et al. Evidential reasoning based preference programming for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty [J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2007, 182(3): 1294-1312. 被引量:1
  • 8Yang J B, Wang Y M, Xu D L, et al. The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2006, 171(1) : 309-343. 被引量:1
  • 9兰继斌,王中兴,乐琦.一种含参数的模糊互补判断矩阵元素与优先权重的逻辑关系[J].广西科学,2007,14(3):213-216. 被引量:5
  • 10HERRERA F, HERRERA-VIEDMA E,CHICLANA F. Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations [J]. Eur J of Oper Res, 2001, 129(2): 372-385. 被引量:1

共引文献870

同被引文献103

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部