摘要
十八届四中全会精神为从宏观的历史逻辑和内在的运行机制上研究群众运动提供了很好的理论工具。从历史逻辑上看,群众运动是"革命的遗产",经过权威理论的论证后进一步巩固了合法性,这与认识和定位上的混淆、党的角色转型和工作方法转变不够自觉、党的领导与群众运动的关系扭曲、体制的一元化和高度集中等因素密切相关。从运行机制上看,群众运动本质上的意识形态化、取向上的否定性、动员体系的高度覆盖、参与者的归类和标签化、方向上的单向性、运行上的突变性、效果上的高效率、后果上的异化性,等等,都标示着群众运动的内在机制与外在特征,在新的时代背景下,我们应在治理、法治与群众路线的框架内对其进行扬弃。
The thoughts of the Fourth Plenary Session oI the 151glateentn t^rt~ ~enum ~ v o-- theoretical tool for the study of mass movement from the angle of maeroscopical historical logic and inner operation mechanism. From the perspective of historical logic, mass movement is ＂one of the heritages of revolution＂, and its legality has been testified and further consolidated by authoritative theories, which is closely related to such negative factors as the confusion o（ understanding and orientation, lack of initiative in transforming the role of the Party and working style, distortion of the relationship between mass movement and governance o{ the Party, homogeneity and centralization of system and so on. From the perspective of operation mechanism, the ideologiealiztion in nature, negativeness in orientation, wide coverage of the mobilization system, classification and labeling of the participants, unidirectivity and mutation in the process of development, alienation of the consequences and so on, all indicate the inner mechanism and external characteristics of mass movement. In today＇ s new historical context, we should abandon the unfavorable aspects of mass movement in the frame of governance, law and mass line.
出处
《安徽农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第5期128-132,共5页
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
基金
安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKQ2014D74:<基于治理和群众自治的群众路线长效机制研究>)
关键词
历史逻辑
运行机制
群众运动
historical logic
operation mechanism
mass movement
