期刊文献+

Damon Q自锁托槽在数字化牙颌模型上的模拟定位研究 被引量:12

Preliminary study on positioning of Damon Q self-ligating brackets in a digital integration model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨数字化托槽模拟定位的准确性。方法对15例数字化牙颌模型上的牙齿(每例28颗)进行托槽模拟定位,定位方法分别采用托槽高度定位法和含牙根信息托槽定位法。采用Ortho Rx软件形成矫治后的最终状态;采用美国正畸目标评分系统(ABO-OGS)评估矫治结果,测量指标包括牙齿排齐、后牙边缘嵴高度及牙根平行度3项。结果 1)虚拟矫治后两种托槽定位方法的边缘嵴高度扣分均小于治疗前(P<0.05),但两种方法虚拟矫治后边缘嵴高度扣分没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。2)含牙根信息托槽定位法虚拟矫治后牙根平行度扣分小于托槽高度定位法,但两种方法虚拟矫治前后牙根平行度未发生明显改善。3)在牙齿排齐及3项总扣分方面,两种托槽定位方法在虚拟矫治前后扣分的差异有统计学意义,矫治后扣分均小于治疗前,含牙根信息托槽定位法矫治后的扣分小于托槽高度定位法(P<0.05)。结论在重建的包含牙根的三维数字化模型上,采用Ortho Rx软件,通过托槽高度定位法及含牙根信息定位法进行托槽定位,模拟矫治均有效果;通过含牙根信息托槽定位法的模拟矫治效果更好。 Objective This study was performed to determine the feasibility of digital virtual positioning of braces in clinical applications. Methods We determined the positions of brackets in 28 teeth of 15 cases according to positioning methods that use bracket height or root information. Final status was generated by OrthoRx software. Treatment results were assessed with American board of orthodontics objective grading system (ABO-OGS). Results The deduction points in the marginal ridge height were significantly decreased after treatment using the two methods (P〈0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the deduction points in the marginal ridge height between the two methods (P〉0.05). No improvement was found in the deduction points in root parallelism with both methods. No statistical significance was found in the deduction points in root parallelism before and after treatments using both methods. The deduction points in alignment and the three scoring components were significantly decreased after treatment using the two positioning methods. In addition, statistically significant differences were found in the deduction points in alignment between two methods (P〈0.05). Conclusion By using OrthoRx software, we achieved effective therapeutic treatment in reconstructing three-dimensional digital modes using two different bracket-positioning methods. The positioning method that used root information is more accurate compared with the bracket height positioning method. This study provides an experimental basis for bracket accuracy in the mouth.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期500-503,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 托槽定位 美国正畸目标评分系统 间接粘接 自锁托槽 bracket positioning American board of orthodontics objective grading system indirect bonding selfligating brackets
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Hayasaki H, Martins RP, Gandini LG, et al. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally[J]. Am J Orthod Den- tofacial Orthop, 2005, 128(1):128-132. 被引量:1
  • 2Hildebrand JC, Palomo JM, Palomo L, et al. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American board of orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 133(2):283-289. 被引量:1
  • 3胡飞,周磊,刘从华,段培佳.双丝技术在SmartClip自锁托槽矫治中的应用[J].广东牙病防治,2013,21(11):608-610. 被引量:5
  • 4严斌,王林,胡遒生,潘林,杨奎,鲍旭东.牙颌模型三维CT扫描测量分析系统的建立和研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2005,23(4):329-331. 被引量:16
  • 5万贤凤,张治勇,王辉玲,章锦才,陈爱华,段培佳.CBCT与激光扫描联合的数字化三维牙颌模型重建[J].贵阳医学院学报,2013,38(4):408-409. 被引量:8
  • 6Israel M, Kusnoto B, Evans CA, et al. A comparison of traditional and computer-aided bracket placement methods [J]. Angle Orthod, 2011, 81(5):828-835. 被引量:1
  • 7Suarez C, Vilar T. The effect of constant height bracket placement on marginal ridge levelling using digitized mo- dels[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2010, 32(1): 100-105. 被引量:1
  • 8Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. Ameri- can Board of Orthodontics[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 114(5):589-599. 被引量:1
  • 9Eliades T, Gioka C, Papaconstantinou S, et al. Premolar bracket position revised: proximal and occlusal contacts assessment[J]. World J Orthod, 2005, 6(2):149-155. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

共引文献26

同被引文献86

引证文献12

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部