期刊文献+

论“发展的条约解释”及其在世贸组织争端解决中的适用 被引量:18

Evolutive Treaty Interpretation and Its Application in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 "条约与时间"是条约解释的永恒主题。晚近以来,以技术变革为代表的客观情势迅猛发展。为实现条约的可适用性,以《维也纳条约法公约》第31条为基础,"发展的条约解释"方法使得条约的解释与适用符合解释时的客观情势。发展的条约解释包括演化解释与嗣后行为解释。在世界贸易组织争端解决实践中,发展的条约解释方法与路径已经趋于成熟。尽管客观情势变化无法直接影响条约权利与义务,但通过条约文本与客观情势变化的相关性,发展的条约解释能够使条约权利与义务有所发展。基于此,发展的条约解释方法应当纳入体系性解释方法之中。在条约的缔结与解释中,我国应明确条约权利与义务发展的可能性,多元化地利用条约解释工具化解国际争端。 "Treaties and time" is the eternal theme of treaty interpretation. In recent years, there have been significant changes in the factual and normative context of treaty inter- pretation. To realize the applicability of treaties and on the basis of Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the method of "evolutive treaty interpretation" was intro- duced to ensure that the interpretation and application of treaties are in keeping with the chan- ging context. "Evolutive treaty interpretation" includes evolutionary interpretation and subse- quent conducts interpretation. In WTO dispute settlement practice, the method of "evolutive treaty interpretation" has gradually matured. Ahhough objective situation can not directly affect treaty rights and obligations, "evolutive treaty interpretation" can be applied to develop treaty rights and obligations through the establishment of links between treaty texts and evolving objec- tive situation. Therefore, "evolutive treaty interpretation" should be incorporated into the meth- od of systematic interpretation. In the conclusion and interpretation of treaties, China should be aware of the possibility of developing treaty rights and obligations and take advantage of "evolu- tive treaty interpretation" to settle the international disputes in diversified ways.
作者 孙南翔
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期161-178,共18页 Global Law Review
基金 2015年重庆市研究生科研创新项目"WTO框架下中国网络安全政策合规性问题研究"(CYB15089) 2014年西南政法大学研究生科研创新重点项目"网络空间的全球治理与国际法问题研究"(XZYJS201406)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献79

  • 1Oscar Schachter, The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements, 71 American Journal of International Law 296, 301 ( 1977 ). 被引量:1
  • 2Jessica Liang, Modifying the UN charter through Subsequent Practice: Prospects for the Charter' s Revitalization, 81 Nordic Journal of lnternational Law 1, 4 -5 (2012). 被引量:1
  • 3Richard K. Gardiner, Treaty Interpretation, Oxford, 2008, p. 225. 被引量:1
  • 4Hersch Lauterpacht, International Law: The General Works, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1,1970, p. 129. 被引量:1
  • 5Georg Nolte, Treaties over time in particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice, Annex A, U. N. Doe. A/63/10, 2008, para. 5. 被引量:1
  • 6Christopher Peters, Subsequent Practice and Established Practice of International Organizations: Two Sides of the Same Coin, 3 Goettingen Journal oflnternational Law 617, 618 (2011). 被引量:1
  • 7Alexander M. Feldman, Evolving Treaty Obligations: A Proposal for Analyzing Subsequent Practice Derived from WTO Dispute Settlement, 41 New York University Journal of International Law and Polities 655, 655 -706 (2009). 被引量:1
  • 8Shin-yi Peng, Taxing Innovation? -- The Evolving Coverage of the Information Tech- nology Agreement, 64 Tax Lawyer 79, 79 -96 (2011). 被引量:1
  • 9Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty and Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 194 - 195. 被引量:1
  • 10Georg Nolte, Treaties over time in particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice, Annex A, U. N. Doc. A/63/10, 2008, para. 7. 被引量:1

二级参考文献35

  • 1刘江永.《从历史事实看钓鱼岛主权归属》,《人民日报》2011年1月13日. 被引量:3
  • 2Report of the International Law Commission, UN Doc. A/60/10( 2005),220,para. 479. 被引量:1
  • 3Island of Palmas (Netherlands v. United States),Award of 4 April 1928, RIAA, Vol. 2,p. 845. 被引量:1
  • 4[英]詹宁斯、瓦茨修订:《奥本海国际法》第9版(第1卷第2分册),王铁崖等译,中国大百科全书出版社1998年版,第 667 - 668 页. 被引量:1
  • 5Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco (France v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 August1952. 被引量:1
  • 6Aegean Sea Continental Shelf ( Greece v. Turkey) , Judgment of 19 December 1978, [ 1978] ICJ Rep. 3, at 67 (Judge deCastro, Dissenting Opinion). 被引量:1
  • 7Gabcikovo - Nagymaros Project ( Hungary/Slovakia) , Judgment of 25 September 1997,[1997] ICJ Rep. 7, at 124,para. 16 (Judge Bedjaoui, Separate Opinion). 被引量:1
  • 8I. Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 633. 被引量:1
  • 9Martin Dawidowicz ’ The Effect of the Passage of Time on the Interpretation of Treaties : Some Reflections on Costa Ricav. Nicaragua, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 24 , 2011, p. 206. 被引量:1
  • 10H. Waldock, Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties, Yearbook of International Law Commission, Vol. I (Part Two) ’ at 199,. 被引量:1

共引文献10

同被引文献458

引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部