摘要
作为一种"潜在破坏性技术",3D打印不仅触及个人非营利性使用专利侵权豁免规则的存废问题,更为我们进一步反思现行专利法宗旨及其实现方式提供了契机。从专利法宗旨,到原则,再到具体规则,三个层面、系统性重构专利制度的"专利法进化论"提出,专利的本质是知识,知识处于不断自由创造、传播、共享和再创造的逻辑循环内,独占或垄断不符合知识自由的逻辑。3D打印时代,专利法应顺应并恢复个人未经授权非营利性使用他人专利技术的自由,让专利法促进技术创新的宗旨实至名归。
To be a kind of potential disruption-technology, 3D printing not only sparks controversy over retention or abolition of infi＇inging exemption rule on nonprofit individual patent-performing activities, but also provides an opportunity for us to reflect on the purposes of current patent law. From the purposes to principles, from the principles to rules, Patent Law Evolution Theory, which reconstructs patent law by three levels systematically, points out that the essence of patent is knowledge, which is created, disseminated, remixed, and recreated continuously, and that is the logic of freedom. So exclusion and monopoly does not comply with the logic of intellectual freedom. In 3D printing era, individual freedom of nonprofit patent performing should be restored. Only in this way, the purpose of promoting technical innovation can be achieved.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第9期51-56,共6页
Intellectual Property
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"国家网络空间安全法律保障机制研究"(13&ZD181)阶段性成果
石家庄经济学院博士科研启动基金项目"网络时代著作权法的进化论"(BQ201304)阶段性成果
