摘要
先秦诸子是中国古代学术体系的重要组成部分,目前所见其基本学术框架是由《汉书·艺文志》建构的。然考诸史籍,《汉志》"诸子出于王官"之说既不见于先秦典籍记载,又与史实矛盾;"九流十家"学术派别的划分亦与先秦学术之实际不符。汉代复兴"官学"的学术思潮与"独尊儒术"的主流文化是造成《汉志》对先秦诸子学术评判偏失的主要原因。所以,"辨章学术,考镜源流",还先秦诸子以本来的学术面貌,是学术史研究的首要任务。*
The pre-Qin academicians＇ scholarships are the integral part of Chinese traditional academia. Its basic academic framework had been constructed in the Hanshu ＂Yiwenzhi＂. Yet the statement of ＂the classical schools of philosophy originated in officialdom＂ in the work has no evidence in pre-Qin records, and in contradiction with historical facts. The classification of ＂Nine Genres and Ten Schools＂ does not fit to the reality of pre-Qin academic. Revival of official academic thought and the doctrine of supreme worship to Confucianism became the major reasons for biased academic evaluation of the pre-Qin philosophers in the Hanshu. So the primary task faced by scholars is to make clear the＇. reality of the past.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第9期55-64,共10页
Journal of Historical Science
基金
国家社科基金后期资助项目“从诸子之学到官方经学”(编号11FZS020)
教育部人文社会科学基金项目“汉初封国文学与学术活动研究”(编号11YJC751045)
关键词
《汉书·艺文志》
先秦诸子
王官
九流十家
战国楚简
the Hanshu ＂ Yiwenzhi＂
pre-Qin academicians
officialdom
Nine Genres aria bambooslips of the Warring States
