摘要
目的：对于采用传统的开胸手术法和电视胸腔镜法进行创伤性血气胸治疗的效果进行比较。方法：回顾性分析我院就诊的创伤性血气胸患者70例。分别采用电视胸腔镜法和开胸手术法治疗患者，记录两组方案治疗患者的住院、手术、胸腔引流等时间，同时对出血量及止痛药用量进行记录。结果：两组患者治疗有效率均良好，无显著性差异。电视胸腔镜手术组中患者的手术时间、住院时间、胸腔引流时间等均优于开胸手术法，且具有显著性差异（P＜0.05）。结论：电视胸腔镜法具有有效、微创、安全可行的特点，值得临床推广。
Objective：To compare with the traditional open chest operation method and the method of traumatic hemopneumothorax by video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment effect.Methods：A retrospective analysis of 70 patients in our hospital for treatment of traumatic hemopneumothorax cases. Respectively VATS and thoracotomy method method to treat patients,recording two regimens hospitalization,surgery,in patients with pleural drainage and other times, while the amount of bleeding and the amount of pain medicine for recording.Results：The two groups of patients treatment effective rate were good,no significant difference.The operation time, patients with thoracoscopic operation in the group hospitalization time, chest drainage time was better than open chest operation method, and the difference was significant （P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Video assisted thoracoscopic method has the characteristics of minimally invasive,effective,safe and feasible,is worth the clinical promotion.
出处
《中外女性健康研究》
2015年第16期174-174,177,共2页
Women＇s Health Research
