期刊文献+

腹腔镜手术治疗进展期远端胃癌近期疗效及安全性研究 被引量:1

Research of short-term curative effect and safety of laparoscope surgery in the treatment of distal gastric cancer in progressive stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗进展期远端胃癌的近期临床疗效及安全性。方法 62例进展期远端胃癌患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为研究组和对照组,各31例,研究组行腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术,对照组行开腹远端胃癌根治术,综合比较两组患者术中、术后情况,并发症发生率及5年生存率。结果研究组手术时间长于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术中出血量、肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间均显著优于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术后并发症发生率为6.45%,显著低于对照组的19.35%(P<0.05);研究组5年生存率51.6%显著高于对照组29.0%(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌疗效显著,并发症少,恢复快。 Objective To investigate short-term curative effect and safety of laparoscope surgery in the treatment of distal gastric cancer in progressive stage. Methods A total of 62 patients with distal gastric cancer in progressive stage were divided by random number table into research group and control group, with 31 cases in each group. The research group received laparoscope radical operation for distal gastric cancer, and the control group received radical operation by laparotomy. Comprehensive comparisons were made on intraoperative and postoperative status, incidences of complications, and five-year survival rate between the two groups. Results The research group had longer operation time(P〈0.05), and obviously better intraoperative bleeding volume, intestinal function recovery time, and hospital stay than the control group(P〈0.05). The research group had much lower incidence of postoperative complications as 6.45% than 19.35% of the control group(P〈0.05). The research group also had obviously higher 5-year survival rate as 51.6% than 29.0% of the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Laparoscope radical operation for distal gastric cancer provides significant effect in treating distal gastric cancer in progressive stage, along with few complications and quick rehabilitation.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2015年第22期30-31,共2页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜 进展期远端胃癌 安全性 Laparoscope Distal gastric cancer in progressive stage Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1Rovers MM,Schilder AG,Zielhuis GA,Rosenfeld RM,张江平,杨妙丽,张全安.中耳炎[J].国外医学(耳鼻咽喉科学分册),2005,29(3):141-143. 被引量:433
  • 2Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Bill roth I gastrectomy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1994,4(2) : 146- 148. 被引量:1
  • 3Athanasiou T, AI-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004,77 (2) : 745-753. 被引量:1
  • 4Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H, et al. Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005,19(9) : 1172-1176. 被引量:1
  • 5Kim Y W, Baik Y H, Ywn Y H, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a prospective randomized clinical trial [J]. Ann Surg,2008,248(5) :721- 727. 被引量:1
  • 6Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujiik, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report[J]. Surgery, 2002,131(1 Suppl) :S306-S311. 被引量:1
  • 7Lee J H, Han H S. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results[J]. Surg Endosc,2005,19(2):168-173. 被引量:1
  • 8Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, et al. Laparoscopy assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy[J]. ArchSurg, 2000,135(7): 806-810. 被引量:1
  • 9KawamuraH, KunisakiO, IsizuH, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer targeting as a less invasive proce dure[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22(1): 81-85. 被引量:1
  • 10Kim M C, Kim K H, Kim H H, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extrap erigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer[J] . J Surg Oncol,2005,91(1) :90-94. 被引量:1

共引文献187

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部