摘要
"醉驾"行为应否一律定罪,成为"醉驾"入刑后自始广受争议的问题。然而,司法实践中具体个案的定性尴尬表明,"醉驾"一律定罪事实上是违反罪刑法定和罪责刑相适应基本原则的错误做法。如此错误,缘于过分强调分则个罪条款之适用同时,忽视了总则之地位及其与分则之内在联系,继而使得"醉驾"定性适用法律并不完整。完整的法律适用,需基于法教义学而认清刑法分则罪名条文规定的规范实质及其与刑法总则的内在关系,对具体个案予以体系化的法律适用。
There is a widely - debated issue on how ＂drunken driving＂ should be determined in law once it is regarded as guilty. Nevertheless, in judicial practice a dilemma occurs. It is as- sumed that if all eases of ＂drunken driving＂ should be matched by sentences, it seems to violate the fundamental principle of crime legally ascertained and punishment correspond- ing to liabilities. Hence, the qualitative decision of ＂drunken driving＂ may be incom- plete, It is argued that law doctrines should be resorted to for a distinction between the na- ture of regulations and the general provisions of criminal law so that a systematic applica- tion can be made to specific cases.
出处
《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第4期149-159,共11页
Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science
基金
西南政法大学校级科研基金项目"行为犯适用困境的法教义学视角研究"[编号:XZYJS2014101]
关键词
“醉驾”
定性
法教义学
刑法典
体系
＂drunken driving＂
qualitative
law doctrines
penal code
system
