摘要
目的分析尿液干化学分析与显微镜行尿常规检验的效果。方法 1200份尿液样本同时进行尿液干化学分析及显微镜检验,对两种检验结果中红细胞及尿蛋白、白细胞阳性率进行比较和分析。结果尿液干化学分析红细胞检测阳性率为16.00%,略高于显微镜检测的15.00%;尿液干化学分析尿蛋白、白细胞检测阳性率分别为17.00%、19.00%,略低于显微镜检测的20.00%、22.00%;两种检验结果比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论尿液干化学分析与显微镜均为检验尿常规的可靠方式,两者结合使用,可进一步提高诊断结果的客观性及科学性。
Objective To analyze effects by urine dry-chemical analysis and urine routine test by microscope. Methods There were 1200 urine samples in urine dry-chemical analysis and microscope test. Analysis and comparison were made on positive rates of erythrocyte, urine protein and leukocyte in test results. Results Urine dry-chemical analysis had slightly higher erythrocyte positive rate as 16.00% than 15.00% of microscope test. Urine dry-chemical analysis had urine protein and leukocyte positive rates as 17.00% and 19.00%, and they were all lower than 20.00% and 22.00% of microscope test. There was no statistically significant difference between these two test methods （P〉0.05）. Conclusion Urine dry-chemical analysis and microscope test are creditable methods for urine routine test. Combined application of these two methods can further improve objectivity and scientificity of test results.
出处
《中国现代药物应用》
2015年第18期7-8,共2页
Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词
尿液干化学分析
显微镜
尿常规
Urine dry-chemical analysis
Microscope
Urine routine
