摘要
目的：研究比较经舌侧骨板切除术与劈开术拔除下颌低住阻生齿的效果。方法：选择80例在我院治疗的下颌低位阻生齿患者，按拔出术方式不同分为切除术组和劈开术组，每组各40例；术后比较2组患者手术时间，张开度及吞咽痛情况。结果：2组患者手术愈合期限一致；切除术组患者手术时间明显比劈开术组多，P〈0．05；比较术后1天张开度情况，切除术组患者口腔明显小于劈开术组，P〈0．05；比较2组患者术后7天张开度情况，差异不明显，P〉0．05，比较2组患者术后1天吞咽痛发生率，切除术组明显高于劈开术组，P〈0．05，术后7天比较差异不明显，P〉0．05。结论：经舌侧骨板劈开术拔除下颌低位阻生齿的比切除术时间要短，且术后各项症状恢复较快，效果明显。
Objective： Study to compare the resection of lingual bone plate and split wipe out the mandibular dentition low resistance effect. Methods： Choose 80 cases of mandibular dentition low resistance of patients treated in our hospital, according to pull out the operation process is divided into different resection group and the open surgery group, 40 cases in each group; Compare two groups of patients after operation time, opening, and swallowing pain. Results： Two groups of patients with surgery healing period was consistent. Patients with operation time resection group was obviously more than open surgery group, P 〈 0.05 ; Comparison of postoperative 1 day opening sit- uation, patients with oral resection group was obviously less than open surgery group, P 〈 0.05 ; Compare two groups of patients with post- operative 7 days opening conditions, no significant difference, P 〉 0. 05, compared two groups of patients with postoperative 1 day, the incidence of pain swallowing resection group was obviously higher than open surgery group, P 〈 0.05, no obvious difference compared postoperative seven days, P 〉 0.05. Conclusion： The lingual bone plate split wipe out the mandibular dentition low resistance than resec- tion operation time is shorter, and faster recovery of various symptoms, which effect is obvious.
出处
《中国伤残医学》
2015年第17期13-14,共2页
Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
