期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的临床对照研究 被引量:40

Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)与内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(EST)治疗胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2012年11月—2014年3月收治的210例胆总管结石患者资料,按手术方式分为LCBDE组(116例)和EST组(94例),对比两组相关临床指标。结果:两组手术成功率差异无统计学意义(99.1%vs.95.74%,P=0.175),但LCBDE组一期治愈率高于EST组(97.4%vs.90.4%,P=0.038);两组残余结石率、平均住院时间与住院费用均无统计学差异(均P>0.05),但EST组一期治疗后9例残余结石患者行第2次EST治疗,6例残余结石患者行第3次EST治疗;首次EST失败的患者,其住院时间与花费明显增加;LCBDE组围手术期总并发症以及远期并发症发生率均明显低于EST组(均P<0.05),差异主要来源于EST相关并发症。结论:LCBDE治疗胆总管结石一期治愈率高于EST,且并发症率低于EST组,能保留十二指肠乳头括约肌的生理功能,可同时实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术处理胆囊病变。因此,在多数情况下,应首先考虑LCBDE。 Objective: To compare the clinical effects between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for common bile duct stones. Methods: Tae data of 210 patients with common bile duct stones treated between November 2012 and March 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into LCBDE group (n= 116) and EST group (n=94) according to the procedure they received, and the main clinical variables between the two groups were compared. Results: The surgical success rate had no significant difference between the two groups (99.1% vs. 95.74, P=0.175), but the one-stage cure rate in LCBDE group was significantly higher than that in EST group (97.4% vs. 90.4%, P=0.038), and there was no significant difference in residual stone rate, and the average length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs between the two groups (all P〉0.05), but in EST group~ 9 cases underwent second EST, and 6 cases underwent third EST after the first-stage treatment due to residual stones, and the length of hospital stay and medical expenses were markedly increased in these cases with first treatment failure. The incidence of perioperative complications and long-term complications in LCBDE group was significantly lower than that in EST group (both P〈0.05), due to the relatively high incidence of the EST-related complications of the latter. Conclusion: For common bile duct stones, the one-stage cure rate of LCBDE is higher than that of EST, with less incidence of complications and preservation of the function of the sphincter of Oddi. In addition, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be simultaneously performed to solve the gallbladder problems during LCBDE. Thus, it should be considered as the first choice of option in most cases.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期1088-1092,共5页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胆总管结石 胆总管探查术 腹腔镜 括约肌切开术 内窥镜 Choledocholithiasis Common Bile Duct Exploration Laparoscopic Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

共引文献381

同被引文献340

引证文献40

二级引证文献547

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部