摘要
在我国,将保护义务确定为合同法上的义务,对于固有利益受侵害后受害人的损害赔偿救济并无实益,反而会造成合同法与侵权责任法之间在适用范围上的大面积竞合,给民法的规范体系带来混乱。我们不应照搬德国合同法中的保护义务制度,而应结合我国法的具体情况,原则上将固有利益受侵害后对受害人的损害赔偿救济交由侵权责任法处理;同时,在一方当事人以自己的行为表明,其将极有可能会利用双方之间的合同关系所带来的机会或便利,违反侵权法上的义务,严重侵害对方当事人的固有利益的场合,应赋予对方当事人合同解除权,以预防侵权行为的发生。
In China, that confirming protection obligation as an obligation in Contract Law has no benefit for the victim＇ s relief of damage compensation, but will cause competition and cooperation between Contract Law and Tort Law in application range, and bring disorder to normative system of Civil Law. We should not copy the protection obligation system of German Contract Law, but deal with the victim＇ s relief of damage compensation according to the Tort Liability Law; at the same time, when one party indicates that he will use opportunity or violate the obligation in Tort Law brought by their contract relationship through action, the other party has the right to terminate the contract to prevent tort.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期206-225,共20页
China Legal Science
基金
湖南大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"资助
