期刊文献+

Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease:A meta-analysis 被引量:7

Transvaginal cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disease:A meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To compare the results of transvaginal cholecystectomy(TVC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy(CLC) for gallbladder disease.METHODS:We performed a literature search of Pub Med,EMBASE,Ovid,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Google Scholar,Meta Register of Controlled Trials,Chinese Medical Journal database and Wanfang Data for trials comparing outcomes between TVC and CLC.Data were extracted by two authors.Mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference(SMD),odds ratios and risk rate with 95%CIs were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with the χ2 test.The fixed-effects model was used in the absence of statistically significant heterogeneity.The randomeffects model was chosen when heterogeneity was found.RESULTS:There were 730 patients in nine controlled clinical trials.No significant difference was found regarding demographic characteristics(P > 0.5),including anesthetic risk score,age,body mass index,and abdominal surgical history between the TVC and CLC groups.Both groups had similar mortality,morbidity,and return to work after surgery.Patients in the TVC group had a lower pain score on postoperative day 1(SMD:-0.957,95%CI:-1.488 to-0.426,P < 0.001),needed less postoperative analgesic medication(SMD:-0.574,95%CI:-0.807 to-0.341,P < 0.001) and stayed for a shorter time in hospital(MD:-1.004 d,95%CI:-1.779 to 0.228,P = 0.011),but had longer operative time(MD:17.307 min,95%CI:6.789 to 27.826,P = 0.001).TVC had no significant influence on postoperative sexual function and quality of life.Better cosmetic results and satisfaction were achieved in the TVC group.CONCLUSION:TVC is safe and effective for gallbladder disease.However,vaginal injury might occur,and further trials are needed to compare TVC with CLC. AIM: To compare the results of transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) for gallbladder disease. METHODS: We performed a literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, MetaRegister of Controlled Trials, Chinese Medical Journal database and Wanfang Data for trials comparing outcomes between TVC and CLC. Data were extracted by two authors. Mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), odds ratios and risk rate with 95% CIs were calculated using fixed-or random-effects models. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with the chi(2) test. The fixed-effects model was used in the absence of statistically significant heterogeneity. The random-effects model was chosen when heterogeneity was found. RESULTS: There were 730 patients in nine controlled clinical trials. No significant difference was found regarding demographic characteristics (P > 0.5), including anesthetic risk score, age, body mass index, and abdominal surgical history between the TVC and CLC groups. Both groups had similar mortality, morbidity, and return to work after surgery. Patients in the TVC group had a lower pain score on postoperative day 1 (SMD: -0.957, 95% CI: -1.488 to -0.426, P < 0.001), needed less postoperative analgesic medication (SMD: -0.574, 95% CI: -0.807 to -0.341, P < 0.001) and stayed for a shorter time in hospital (MD: -1.004 d, 95% CI: -1.779 to 0.228, P = 0.011), but had longer operative time (MD: 17.307 min, 95% CI: 6.789 to 27.826, P = 0.001). TVC had no significant influence on postoperative sexual function and quality of life. Better cosmetic results and satisfaction were achieved in the TVC group. CONCLUSION: TVC is safe and effective for gallbladder disease. However, vaginal injury might occur, and further trials are needed to compare TVC with CLC.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第17期5393-5406,共14页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81001007,No.81100826,and No.81270003 Fudan University Youth Fund(2012) the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars,Chinese Ministry of Education
关键词 TRANSVAGINAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY Conventionallaparoscopic CHOLECYSTECTOMY Natural ORIFICE Endoscopicsurgery META-ANALYSES Transvaginal cholecystectomy Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy Natural orifice Endoscopic surgery Meta-analyses
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Bazzi WM, Stroup SP, Cohen SA, Sisul DM, Liss MA, MastersonJH, Kopp RP, Gudeman SR, Leeflang E, Palazzi KL, RamamoorthyS, Kane CJ, Horgan S, Derweesh IH. Comparison of transrectaland transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopicsurgery partial nephrectomy in the porcine model. Urology 2013;82: 84-89 [PMID: 23676357 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.007]. 被引量:1
  • 2Vieira JP, Linhares MM, Caetano EM, Moura RM, Asseituno V,Fuzyi R, Gir-o MJ, Ruano JM, Goldenberg A, de Jesus L Filho G,Matos D. Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responsesin exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versuslaparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine. Surg Endosc2012; 26: 3232-3244 [PMID: 22729703 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2329-x]. 被引量:1
  • 3Liu BR, Kong LJ, Song JT, Liu W, Yu H, Dou QF. Feasibilityand safety of functional cholecystectomy by pure NOTES: a pilotanimal study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 740-745[PMID: 22970657 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0154]. 被引量:1
  • 4Córdova H, Guarner-Argente C, Martínez-Pallí G, NavarroR, Rodríguez-D'Jesús A, Rodríguez de Miguel C, Beltrán M,Martínez-Zamora Mà, Comas J, Lacy AM, Thompson CC,Fernández-Esparrach G. Gastric emptying is delayed in transgastricNOTES: a randomized study in swine. J Surg Res 2012; 174:e61-e67 [PMID: 22225977 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.034]. 被引量:1
  • 5Bernhardt J, K-hler P, Rieber F, Diederich M, Schneider-KoriathS, Steffen H, Ludwig K, Lamadé W. Pure NOTES sigmoidresection in an animal survival model. Endoscopy 2012; 44:265-269 [PMID: 22354825 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291546]. 被引量:1
  • 6Zheng Y, Wang D, Kong X, Chen D, Wu R, Yang L, Yu E, ZhengC, Li Z. Initial experience from the transgastric endoscopicperitoneoscopy and biopsy: a stepwise approach from thelaboratory to clinical application. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26: 888-893 [PMID: 21251061 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746]. 被引量:1
  • 7Voermans RP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA,Fockens P. Hybrid NOTES transgastric cholecystectomywith reliable gastric closure: an animal survival study. SurgEndosc 2011; 25: 728-736 [PMID: 20721586 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1242-4]. 被引量:1
  • 8Sohn DK, Jeong SY, Park JW, Kim JS, Hwang JH, Kim DW, KangSB, Oh JH. Comparative study of NOTES rectosigmoidectomyin a swine model: E-NOTES vs. P-NOTES. Endoscopy 2011; 43:526-532 [PMID: 21425040 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256239]. 被引量:1
  • 9Earle DB, Romanelli JR, McLawhorn T, Omotosho P, Wu P,Rossini C, Swayze H, Desilets DJ. Prosthetic mesh contaminationduring NOTES(-) transgastric hernia repair: a randomizedcontrolled trial with swine explants. Hernia 2012; 16: 689-695[PMID: 22744411 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0944-z]. 被引量:1
  • 10Nau P, Ellison EC, Muscarella P, Mikami D, Narula VK,Needleman B, Melvin WS, Hazey JW. A review of 130 humansenrolled in transgastric NOTES protocols at a single institution.Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1004-1011 [PMID: 20976500 DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1369-3]. 被引量:1

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部