期刊文献+

胸部手术引流的改良 被引量:2

Application of a modified catheter drainage in the thoracic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨对胸部手术传统粗管连接水封瓶引流方式的改进。方法 通过对我院28例(31人次)胸部手术引流改良采用细软管负压球袋装置代替粗管水封瓶引流术后的观察,总结改进引流后患者疼痛程度、下床活动时间、放置引流管的时间、有无引流管的堵塞和拔出引流管后胸腔穿刺次数。结果 术后疼痛程度,轻度15例,中度11例,重度2例;15人次未使用任何止痛药,12人次口服1-2次止痛药,4人次分别有3次以上使用止痛药。放置引流管后,开始下床活动的时间0.5-12小时,引流管留置的时间为6小时-21天,24小时引流量为2-2800 m L,无引流管堵塞现象。引流管拔除后没有需要胸腔穿刺病例。无一例胸腔内和手术引流切口感染,没有医源性气胸。结论 胸部手术后采用细软管负压球袋装置引流,创伤小,也不易堵塞,可较长时间放置,临床效果良好。 Objective To investigate the effect of chest surgical drainage by using modified catheter drainage in thoracic surgery. Methods Twenty-eight cases undergoing thoracic operation from July 2014 to December 2014 were included in the study. All patients received the intrathoracic drainage by using a narrow hose catheter with a negative pressure ball and pocket instead of traditional thick tube with water-sealed bottle. Pain degree, out-of-bed time, duration of catheter drainage,catheter obstruction, repeated thoracentesis were recorded and analyzed. Results Postoperative pain degree was concerned with mild pain in 15 cases, moderate pain in 11 cases, and severe pain in 2cases. And 13 cases took pain-killer, 1-2 times in 12 cases, more than 3 times in 4 cases. The fastest time to walk down bedding was 0.5-12 hours. Indwelling drainage tube stayed from 6 hours to21 days. The volume of 24-hours-drainage ranged from 2 to 2800 ml. No catheter was found obstruction. None of patients need pleural puncture again after removal of the fine hose tube.Conclusion In our study, the fine hose catheter with a negative pressure ball and pocket device had a good clinical effect with small wound, free drainage, and could be indwelled for a long time.
出处 《岭南现代临床外科》 2015年第4期498-500,共3页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(8157010007)
关键词 胸部引流 细软引流管 负压球袋 粗引流管 水封瓶 Chest drainage Small-bore tube Negative pressure ball and pocket Thick catheter Water-sealed bottle
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Zisis C, Tsirgogianni K, Lazaridis G, et al. Chest drainage systems in use [J]. Ann Trans! Med, 2015, 3(3): 43. 被引量:1
  • 2Liman ST, Elicora A, Akgul AG, et al. Is a small-bore catheter efficient for most pleural pathologies [J]? Surg Today, 2014, 44(5): 834-838. 被引量:1
  • 3冯彩婷,熊云田,李俊鹏,任杰.负压球细管引流在肺癌术中的临床应用[J].现代肿瘤医学,2010,18(6):1128-1129. 被引量:3
  • 4王子伟,黄金星,熊云田,杨洪生,张东辉,冯彩婷.食管癌贲门癌术后负压球细管引流103例[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2002,18(4):207-207. 被引量:10
  • 5Fysh ET, Smith NA, Lee YC. Optimal chest drain size: the rise of the small-bore pleural catheter [J]. Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2010, 31(6): 760-768. 被引量:1
  • 6Light RW. Pleural controversy: optimal chest tube size for drainage [J]. Respirology, 2011, 16(2): 244-248. 被引量:1
  • 7Ahmed O, Zangan S. Emergent management of empyema [ J ]. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2012, 29(3): 226-230. 被引量:1
  • 8Epstein E, Jayathissa S, Dee S. Chest tube drainage of pleural effusions -an audit of current practice and complications at Hutt Hospital [J]. N Z Med J, 2012, 125(1354):26-35. 被引量:1

二级参考文献4

共引文献11

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部