期刊文献+

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在广东基层医院应用体会 被引量:2

Application of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in primary hospital of Guangdong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在广东基层医院应用的经验和体会。方法回顾分析2011年1月至2013年6月间腹股沟疝患者共385例,根据已完成手术分分腹腔镜组(n=178)和开放组(n=207),腹腔镜组行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术,开放组行Lichtenstein修补术。对比两组患者手术时间、平均住院时间、住院费用、正常活动平均恢复时间以及术后并发症等指标。结果腹腔镜组平均住院费用高,但恢复正常活动时间短、住院时间短、术后疼痛少以及术后阴囊水肿发生少;腔镜组有5例患者中转开放手术,平均手术时间腔镜组略长于开放组。结论腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后患者较开放组恢复快、痛苦少,但需要全麻且费用较高,基层医院可选择性实施。 Objective To investigate the clinical application and effect of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia(TAPP) repair in primary hospital. Methods 385 patients with inguinal hernia from January 2011 to June 2013 were divided into two groups, laparoscopy group(n =178) and open operation group(n =207) according to the surgical approach. Operating time,hospital stay, medical costs, recovery of daily life and postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Results Laparoscopy group showed higher medical costs than open group, but had faster recovery of daily activities and less postoperative complications after TAPP. Five cases were transferred to open operation. Conclusion TAPP procedure has an advantage of less postoperative complications and faster recovery. For experienced primary hospital, laparoscopic TAPP can be applied.
出处 《岭南现代临床外科》 2015年第4期436-439,共4页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
关键词 腹股沟疝 经腹腹膜前 疝修补术 基层医院 Inguinal hernia Transabdominal preperitoneal Hernia repair Primary hospital
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ger R. The management of intra-abdominal closure of the certain abdominal herniae by neck of the sac. Preliminarycommunication [ J ]. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 1982, 64 (5) : 342-324. 被引量:1
  • 2陈双..腹股沟疝外科学[M],2005.
  • 3McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et al. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003 (1): CD001785. 被引量:1
  • 4Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanaqh DO, et al. Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(12) : 3059-3064. 被引量:1
  • 5Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(15): 1819-1827. 被引量:1
  • 6WrightDM, Kennedy A, Baxter JN, et al. Early outcome after open versus extraperitoneal endoscopic tension-free hernioplasty: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Surgery, 1996, 119(5) : 552-557. 被引量:1
  • 7Johansson B, Hallerback B, Glise H, et al. Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study)[J]. Ann Surg, 1999, 230 (2) : 225-231. 被引量:1
  • 8Dnlueq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3, 100 hernia repairs over 15 years[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23 (3) : 482-486. 被引量:1
  • 9The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Laparoscopie versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison[J]. Lancet, 1999, 354(9174): 185-190. 被引量:1
  • 10Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, et al. Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97 (4) : 600-608. 被引量:1

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部