期刊文献+

认识情态的主客观性变化及机理--主观性和主观化视角之分析 被引量:11

Variation in subjectivity and objectivity of epistemic modality and its underlying mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 文献分析表明,已有研究对英语认识情态主客观性的区分主要依赖言据,实质上忽视了说话人的作用,尚存缺陷和不足。本文尝试用主观性和主观化理论解释认识情态主客观类型的变化。研究发现,认识情态的主客观性由说话者思维深刻度和说话者与命题的二分或融合的关系决定,说话者思维深刻、情态与命题二分时为主观情态,否则为客观情态;认识情态主客观性的变化机制为图形-背景变换,情态动词和命题可以互为图形和背景,较好地解释了认识情态主客观性的转换。 A review of the literature shows that existing studies classify subjectivity and objectivity of epistemic modality in terms of evidentiality,ignoring the role of the speaker.This paper,however,attempts to explicate changes in subjectivity and objectivity of epistemic modality by drawing upon the theory of subjectivity and subjectification.It argues that variation in subjectivity and objectivity of epistemic modality is affected by the depth of the speaker's thinking and the separate or integrated relation between the speaker and proposition concerned.To be specific,the epistemic modality is subjective when the speaker meditates deeply and is isolated from the proposition;otherwise,the epistemic modality is objective.The mechanism of change in subjectivity and objectivity of epistemic modality is believed to be a shift in figure and ground,where epistemic modality and the proposition concerned appear as figure and ground respectively.
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期522-534,640,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 汤敬安主持的湖南省社科基金课题“英汉情态范畴向将来时演变研究”(11WLH46)的系列成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Arrese, J. 2009. Commitment and subjectivity in the discourse of a judicial inquiry [A]. In R. Salkie & P. Busuttil (eds.). 2009. 237-268. 被引量:1
  • 2Celle, A. 2009. Hearsay adverb and modality [A]. In R. Salkie(ed.). Modality in English I-C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 269-293. 被引量:1
  • 3Coates, J. 1983. The Semantic of Modal Auxiliaries [M]. London: Croom Helm Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 4Langacker, R. 1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity ~A]. In J. Haiman (ed.). Iconicity in Syntax I-C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109-150. 被引量:1
  • 5Langacker, R. 1990. Subjectification [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5-38. 被引量:1
  • 6Langacker, R. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Larreya, P. & C. Riviere. 1999. Grammar Explicative de L~anglais [M]. London: Longman. 被引量:1
  • 8Lazard, G. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality [J]. Journal o fPragmatics 33: 359-367. 被引量:1
  • 9Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics [M]. Cambridge: CUP. 被引量:1
  • 10Migette, R. 2009. Using the adjectives surprised/surprising to express epistemic modalityEA~. In R. Salkie & P. Busuttil (eds.). Modality in English EM]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 223-232. 被引量:1

二级参考文献89

共引文献117

同被引文献95

引证文献11

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部