摘要
在科技与生活日新月异的当下,"避风港规则"在网络交易平台商标侵权判定中不可避免地呈现出主体规制与行为规制的双重萎缩,网络交易平台商事前审查义务之界分从而成为司法裁判的难点。笔者以"事故避免可能性"的经济权衡为指引,将既有司法经验提炼为实质利益的确定性标准,并进一步构建出行业类别标准,适用于网络交易平台商虽没有从侵权信息的传播或交易中获利但亦应承担事前审查义务的情形,期望有效解决当下之困。
As the technology and life change quickly, safe harbor rules inevitably presents inefficient in regulating subject and behavior in trademark infringement of e-commerce platform providers. How to judge the pre-incident examination duty of e-commerce platform providers becomes a judicial problem. According to the economic balance theory of ＂probability of avoiding the accident＂ , established standard of substantial benefit is refined from existing judicial experience, meanwhile, the industry category standard is also presented, which can be applied when e-commerce platform providers undertake the pre-incident examination duty even though they do not obtain profit from the transmission and transaction of infringement information.
出处
《电子知识产权》
2015年第6期30-36,共7页
Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词
网络交易平台
商标侵权
避风港规则
审查义务
e-commerce platform provider
trademark infringement
safe harbor rules
pre- incident examination duty
