期刊文献+

Aa、Ba指示点对盆底重建手术时隐匿性压力性尿失禁的诊断及预后价值 被引量:16

POP-Q indication points, Aa and Ba, involve in diagnosis and prognosis of occult stress urinary incontinence complicated with pelvic organ prolapse
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨重度(Ⅲ~Ⅳ度)盆底器官脱垂(POP)患者Aa、Ba指示点对隐匿性压力性尿失禁(OSUI)的诊断及预后价值。方法回顾性分析于2007年1月至2012年9月在武汉大学人民医院因“POPⅢ-IV度”行全盆底重建手术的93例患者(术前均无显性尿失禁)的临床资料,其中,44例为POP合并OSUI者被纳入POP合并OSUI组,其余49例单纯POP患者纳入单纯POP组,并于术后3、6、12、24个月随访术后新发SUI情况,通过logistie回归分析术后新发SUI的危险因素,结合受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP.Q)分度指标中Aa、Ba指示点对术前OSUI的诊断及预后价值。结果(1)POP合并OSUI组术后24个月新发SUI的发生率为30%(13/44),显著高于单纯POP组(4%,2/49),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。(2)logistic回归分析显示,阴道分娩次数(OR=5.327,95%CI为1.120~25.347)、慢性便秘(OR=5.789,95%CI为1.492—22.459)、术前合并OSUI(OR=13.695,95%CI为2.980~62.944)、阴道前壁膨出(OR=6.115,95%CI为1.231~30.379)是重度POP患者术后新发SUI的独立危险因素。(3)针对POP合并OSUI者,ROC曲线选取+1.5cm为Aa指示点预测术后新发SUI的阈值,ROC曲线下面积为0.889(P〈0.05),敏感度为88.9%,特异度为73.9%;选择+2.5am为Ba指示点预测OSUI术后新发SUI的阈值,ROC曲线下面积为0.766(P〈0.05),敏感度为66.7%,特异度为82.6%。结论重度POP患者术前合并OSUI是盆底重建手术后新发SUI的独立危险因素。术前Aa、Ba指示点与是否合并OSUI具有相关性,并在盆底重建手术后新发SUI的风险预测方面有一定价值。 Objective To investigate the correlation between pelvic organ prolapse quantitation (POP-Q) indication points and the incidence of occuh stress urinary incontinence (OSUI) and its impact on prognosis. Methods Retrospective study medical records of 93 patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) staged at Ⅲ- IV, of which underwent pelvic reconstruction operations with Prolift system from Jan. 2007 to Sept. 2012. None of these patients had clinical manifestations of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) before surgery, and in which 44 patients were included in study group (POP complicated with OSUI) because they were identified with OSUI, another 49 patients as control group (simple POP). Follow-up and collecting datas including POP-Q, stress test, urodynamic recordings, incidence of de novo SUI, statistic analyzing by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results (1) The study group had a much higher incidence of 30% (13/44) on de novo SUI than that of control group (4%, 2/49; P〈0.01). (2) Vaginal delivery (0R=5.327, 95% CI: 1.120- 25.347), constipation (0R=5.789, 95% CI: 1.492- 22.459), preoperative OSUI (OR=13.695, 95% CI: 2.980-62.944), anterior vaginal wall prolapse (0R=6.115, 95% CI: 1.231- 30.379) were identified as dependent risk factors for de novo SUI by logistic regression analysis. (3) For POP patients that complicated with OSUI, we chose a cutoff value of + 1.5 cm for Aa point as the threshold to predicting incidence of de novo SUI according to ROC curve, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.889 (P〈 0.05), the sensitivity reached 88.9% and specificity was 73.9%. According to ROC curve of Ba point, a cutoff value of +2.5 cm was chosen as the threshold to predicting incidence of de novo SUI post-operation, it had a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 82.6%, AUC was 0.766 (P〈0.05). Conclusions Pre-operative OSUI is a dependent risk factor of de novo SUI for advanced POP patients. Aa an
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期415-419,共5页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81270684) 湖北省卫生厅年度科研项目(NX2011-5)
关键词 盆底器官脱垂 尿失禁 压力性 ROC曲线 预后 疾病严重程度指数 Pelvic organ prolapse Urinary incontinence, stress ROC curve Prognosis Severity of illness index
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I,et al. Pelvic organ prolapsein the Women, s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidityfj].Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 186(6):1160-1166. 被引量:1
  • 2Long CY, Hsu SC, Wu TP, et al. Urodynamic comparison ofcontinent and incontinent women with severe uterovaginalprolapse[J]. J Reprod Med, 2004, 49(1):33-37. 被引量:1
  • 3van der Steen A, van der Ploeg M, Dijkgraaf MG, et al.for the CUPIDO trials; multicenter randomizedcontrolled trials to assess the value of combining prolapsesurgery and incontinence surgery in patients with genitalprolapse and evident stress incontinence (CUPIDO I) and inpatients with genital prolapse and occult stress incontinence(CUPIDO II)[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2010,10:16. 被引量:1
  • 4杨翔,李怀芳.盆底重建术后压力性尿失禁的临床决策[J].现代妇产科进展,2011,20(2):149-152. 被引量:8
  • 5Avery KN, Bosch JL, Gotoh M,et al. Questionnaires to assessurinary and anal incontinence: review and recommendations[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177(1):39-49. 被引量:1
  • 6Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology ofsurgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinaryincontinence[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 89(4):501-506. 被引量:1
  • 7Romanzi LJ. Management of the urethral outlet in patientswith severe prolapsefj]. Curr Opin Urol, 2002, 12(4):339-344. 被引量:1
  • 8丁峰,宋岩峰,丘娜璇.厦门社区成年女性尿失禁患病状况流行病学调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2012,27(6):882-885. 被引量:17
  • 9王建六,张晓红.女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊疗进展[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008,24(1):30-33. 被引量:140
  • 10Ennemoser S, Schonfeld M, von Bodungen V, et al. Clinicalrelevance of occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI)following vaginal prolapse surgery: long-term follow-up[J]. IntUrogynecol J, 2012, 23(7):851-855. 被引量:1

二级参考文献106

  • 1游珂,韩劲松,顾方颖,王秀云,高荣莲,张璐芳.传统阴式手术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂术后疗效研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1192-1194. 被引量:44
  • 2张晓红,王建六,金玲,王世军,魏丽惠.补片在女性盆底重建手术的应用-18例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2006,7(1):9-12. 被引量:56
  • 3朱兰,郎景和,王宏,韩少梅,刘春燕.北京地区成年女性尿失禁的流行病学研究[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(11):728-731. 被引量:186
  • 4杨欣,王建六.盆腔脏器脱垂治疗进展[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(1):3-4. 被引量:49
  • 5Petros PE.The female pelvic floor-function,dysfunction and management according to the integral theory[J].Springer Medizin VerLag Heidelberg,2004,95:137-141. 被引量:1
  • 6De Lancey JOL.Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress incontinence:the hammock hypothesis[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1994,170:1713-1723. 被引量:1
  • 7Behnia-Willison F,Seman EI,Cook JR,et al.LaParoscopic paravaginal repair of anterior compartment prolapse[J].J Minim Invasive Gyneool,2007,14(4):475-480. 被引量:1
  • 8Daneshgari F,Kefer JC,Moore C.et al.Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrootempexy rear of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe(POP):utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes[J].BJU Int,2007,100(4):875-879. 被引量:1
  • 9Falagas ME,Velakoulis S,lavazzo C,et al.Mesh-relined infections after pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery[J].Eur J Obstet Cynecol Repred Biol,2007,134(2):147-156. 被引量:1
  • 10Fatton B,Amblard J,Debedinance P,et al.Transvaginul repair of genital prolapse:preliminary results of a NeW tension-free vaginal mesh(Prolift technique)-a case series multicentric study[J].Int J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2007,18:743-752. 被引量:1

共引文献179

同被引文献150

  • 1戴顺.老年女性前盆腔器官脱垂手术治疗体会[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(3):123-123. 被引量:1
  • 2宋岩峰,陈美芳,周德,李亚钦.718例妇科检查者盆底脱垂患病状况分析[J].福建医药杂志,2005,27(3):18-20. 被引量:21
  • 3王建六.女性盆底功能障碍性疾病研究进展[J].中国医刊,2005,40(8):10-11. 被引量:21
  • 4罗新,董晓梅.女性压力性尿失禁患病危险性的多因素非条件logistic回归分析[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2007,3(4):205-208. 被引量:19
  • 5Bai SW, Jeon MJ, Kim JY, et al. Relationship between stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse[J]. IntUrogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunt, 2002, 13(4): 256-260. 被引量:1
  • 6Sung VW, Rogers RG, Schaffer JI, et al. Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008,112(5):1131-1142. 被引量:1
  • 7Lo TS, Nawawi EA, Wu PY, et al. Predictors for persistent urodynamic stress ineontinenee following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery with and without midurethral sling[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016,27(3):399-406. 被引量:1
  • 8陈义松,曹琦,胡昌东,等.全盆底重建术前、术后尿失禁变化的研究[C]//中华医学会妇产科学分会.中华医学会第十次全国妇产科学术会议论文汇编,2012,厦门.北京:中华医学会妇产科学分会,2012:56. 被引量:1
  • 9Lo TS, Bt KN, Nawawi EA, et al. Predictors for de novo stress urinary incontinence following extensive pelvic reconstructive surgery[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2015,26(9):1313-1319. 被引量:1
  • 10Boyle D J, Knowles CH, Murphy J, et al. The effects of age and childbirth on anal sphincter function and morphology in 999 symptomatic female patients with colorectal dysfunction[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012,55(3):286-293. DOI: 10,1097/ DCR.0b013e31823fe7f1. Smith AR, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1989,96(1): 24-28. 被引量:1

引证文献16

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部