期刊文献+

血清胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ、Ⅱ及其比值诊断效能评价 被引量:8

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of serum pepsinogenⅠ, pepsinogen Ⅱ,and their ratio
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以血清胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ(PGⅠ)、Ⅱ(PGⅡ)及其PGⅠ/PGⅡ比值(PGR)作为筛查慢性萎缩性胃炎和胃癌前期病变指标,评价其诊断效能。方法收集经胃镜排除胃肿瘤的患者474例,进一步将受检者分为轻度非萎缩性胃炎组(对照组,n=164)、萎缩性胃炎组(n=162)和萎缩性胃炎伴肠上皮化生(简称肠化)组(n=148)。以乳胶增强免疫比浊法定量检测血清PGⅠ和PGⅡ,计算PGR,通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评价PGⅠ、PGⅡ和PGR的诊断价值。结果萎缩性胃炎组和萎缩性胃炎伴肠化组PGⅠ、PGⅡ和PGR较对照组显著降低(P<0.01)。PGⅠ、PGⅡ和PGR诊断萎缩性胃炎,其ROC曲线下面积(AUCROC)分别为0.679、0.593和0.622,最佳临界值分别为71.8、9.1和8.12,灵敏度分别为66.1%、54.3%和77.2%,特异度分别为61.0%、61.6%和43.9%;诊断萎缩性胃炎伴肠化AUCROC分别为0.787、0.583和0.836,最佳临界值分别为59.4、9.8和6.76,灵敏度分别为64.9%、58.8%和81.8%,特异度分别为78.1%、55.5%和77.4%。PGⅠ和PGR平行联合,灵敏度为93.6%、特异度为60.4%;PGⅠ和PGR序列联合,灵敏度为53%、特异度为95%。结论 PGⅠ和PGR作为监测胃黏膜状态的指标,联合运用能提高诊断效率;当PGⅠ和PGR同时小于最佳临界值时可预测萎缩性胃炎伴肠化。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of adopting serum pepsinogen Ⅰ (PG Ⅰ ), pepsinogen Ⅱ (PGⅡ ), and the ratio of PG Ⅰand PG Ⅱ(PGR) as indexes for screening the chronic atrophic gastritis and precursor lesions of gastric cancer. Methods A total of 474 patients who were diagnosed with diseases other than gastric cancer by the gastroscope were selected and divided into the minor non-atrophic gastritis group (control group, n =164), chronic atrophic gastritis group (n =162), and chronic atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia group (n =148). Serum PG I and PG 11 levels were quantitatively measured by the latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric method and the PGR was calculated. The diagnostic performance of PG Ⅰ , PG Ⅱ, and PGR was evaluated by the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Compared with the control group, PG Ⅰ level, PG Ⅱ level, and PGR of the chronic atrophic gastritis group and chronic atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia group decreased significantly (P〈0.01). Values of the area under the ROC (AUCaoc) of PGⅠ , PGⅡ, and PGR for diagnose of chronic atrophic gastritis were 0. 679, 0. 593, and 0. 622; the best cutoff values were 71.8, 9.1, and 8.12; the values of sensitivity were 66.1%, 54.3%, and 77.2% ; and the values of specificity were 61.0%, 61.6% and, 43.9%. Values of AUCaoc of PGⅠ , PGⅡ, and PGR for diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia were 0. 787, 0. 583, and 0. 836; the best cut-off values were 59.4, 9.8, and 6.76; the values of sensitivity were 64.9%, 58.8%, and 81.8% ; and the values of specificity were 78.1%, 55.5% and 77.4%. The values of parallel combined sensitivity and specificityof PG I and PGR were 93.6% and 60.4%, while the values of series combined sensitivity and specificity of PG Ⅰ and PGR were 53% and 95%. Conclusion Combined use of PG Ⅰ level and PGR as indexes for monitoring the status of gastric mucosa can improve the diagnostic performance. It is a
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期860-863,共4页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
关键词 胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ 胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ 胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ/胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ比值 灵敏度 特异度 受试者工作特征曲线 pepsinogen Ⅰ p.epsinogen Ⅱ pepsinogen ratio sensitivity specificity receiver operator charac-teristic curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Vaananen H, Vauhkonen M, Helske T, et al. Non-endoscopic diag- nosis of atrophic gastritis with a blood test. Correlation between gastric histology and serum levels of gastrin-17 and pepsinogen I: a muhicentre study[ J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003, 15 (8) : 885 -891. 被引量:1
  • 2Storskrubb T, Are P, Ronkainen J, et al. Serum biomarkers provide an accurate method for diagnosis of atrophic gastritis in a general population: the Kalixanda study[ J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2008, 43(12) : 1448 - 1455. 被引量:1
  • 3Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, et al. Classification and gradingof gastritis. The updated sydney system. International workshop on the histopathology of gastritis, Houston 1994 [ J ]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1996, 20(10) : 1161 -1181. 被引量:1
  • 4Weck MN, Brenner H. Prevalence of chronic atrophic gastritis in different parts of the world[ J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2006, 15(6): 1083-1094. 被引量:1
  • 5Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002 [J]. CA CancerJClin, 2005, 55(2): 74-108. 被引量:1
  • 6Melton SD, Genta RM, Souza RF. Biomarkers and molecular diag- nosis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neoplasms[ J]. Nat Rev Gas- troenterol Hepatol, 2010, 7( 11 ): 620- 628. 被引量:1
  • 7Piazuelo MB, Correa P. Gastric cancer: overview[ J]. Colomb Med (Call), 2013, 44(3) : 192 -201. 被引量:1
  • 8Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade[ J]. J Dig Dis, 2012, 13(1) : 2 -9. 被引量:1
  • 9Correa P, Piazuelo MB, Wilson KT. Pathology of gastric intestinal metaplasia: clinical implications [ J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2010, 105(3) : 493 -498. 被引量:1
  • 10Samloff IM. Pepsinogens I and 1I : purification from gastric mueosa and radioimmunoassay in serum [ J]. Gastroenterology, 1982, 82 (1) : 26 -33. 被引量:1

二级参考文献61

共引文献779

同被引文献97

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部