期刊文献+

捷联式航空重力测量算法比较 被引量:7

Algorithm comparison for strapdown airborne gravimetry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 捷联式航空重力测量系统与平台式系统相比具有体积小、重量轻、功耗低等许多优点,近些年来取得了显著的研究进展.本文给出了捷联式航空重力测量的两种算法模型:捷联式惯性标量重力测量(SISG)和旋转不变式标量重力测量(RISG)模型,并对其误差模型作了初步讨论.利用我国首套捷联式航空重力仪SGA-WZ01在某海域的部分试验数据,对两种算法模型进行了比较分析,表明其差值之标准差对于200s的滤波长度小于0.5mGal.同时,利用两组重复测线数据估算了不同滤波尺度下的两种算法的内符合精度,表明SISG算法略优于RISG算法.对于200s和300s的滤波长度,SISG的内符合精度分别为1.06mGal和0.80mGal. According to the use of different specific force system,airborne gravimetry system can be classified into two-axis platform system,triple-axis platform system and strapdown system.Strapdown airborne gravimetry system has many advantages over platform system,such as small size,light weight and low power dissipation.Lots of progresses in the development of the strapdown airborne scalar gravimeter are achieved over the last decade.Our own first prototype of the strapdown airborne scalar gravimeter(named SGA-WZ01)was developed in 2008 and has been verified by several flight tests.Obviously,it is necessary to design a suitable algorithm model for strapdown airborne gravimetry.Therefore,the algorithm models are compared by using the test data of the SGA-WZ01 in the sea area and their internal accuracy from repeated flight lines for different filter amount was evaluated in this paper.Two algorithm models for strapdown airborne gravimetry are used in general,namely the models of strapdown inertial scalar gravimetry(SISG)and rotation invariant scalar gravimetry(RISG).The differences of the two models reside in three aspects.The first difference is that the SISG model requires both specific forces and attitude angles as input,while the RISG model requires only specific forces(here both only the inertial units information are considered).Thesecond difference is that the SISG model is a linear form of the specific forces and the RISG model is a square form.The latter form may change the characteristics of the noise signal due to the squaring,e.g.a zero-mean noise will after the squaring have a positive mean value,and hence it may become a potential way to bias the gravity estimates.The third difference is the error models,which are difficult to be quantified and compared directly.Based on two pairs of repeated flights data,the spectral characteristics of gravity disturbances obtained by the two models and the internal accuracy for the two models in different filter amount were compared and analyzed.The result
出处 《地球物理学报》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期1547-1554,共8页 Chinese Journal of Geophysics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41174017)资助
关键词 捷联式航空重力测量 捷联式惯性标量重力测量 旋转不变式标量重力测量 低通滤波 内符合精度 Strapdown airborne gravimetry Strapdown inertial scalar gravimetry Rotation invariant scalar gravimetry Lowpass filter Internal accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1夏哲仁,石磐,孙中苗,王兴涛,李迎春,肖云,朱非洲,李晓燕.航空重力测量系统CHAGS[J].测绘学报,2004,33(3):216-220. 被引量:33
  • 2孙中苗,夏哲仁,王兴涛,李迎春,肖云.平原地区航空重力测量的精度分析[J].测绘通报,2006(10):1-4. 被引量:12
  • 3中华人民共和国地质矿产行业标准-区域重力调查规范(DZ/T0082—93) 被引量:1
  • 4中华人民共和国地质矿产行业标准-地面高精度磁测技术规程(DZ/T0071-93) 被引量:1
  • 5中华人民共和国地质矿产行业标准-航空磁测技术规范(DZ/T0142-94) 被引量:1
  • 6Andy Green, Richard Lane. Estimating noise levels in AEM data. ASEG 16^th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, February 2003, Adelaide 被引量:1
  • 7Gabell A, Olsen D, Tuckett H. The GT-1A mobile gravimeter. ASEG 2004 Airborne Gravity Workshop, 2004 被引量:1
  • 8Bruton A M. Improving the Accuracy and Resolution of SINS/ GPS Airborne Gravimetry, Calgary : Department of Geomaties Engineering at University of Calgary ,2001 被引量:1

共引文献55

同被引文献176

引证文献7

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部