期刊文献+

城市邻避现象的法律防控 被引量:5

LEGAL PREVENTION AND CONTROL ON URBAN NIMBY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 邻避现象是我国城市化进程中一个非常棘手、复杂的问题。邻避现象的本质并非单纯的利益问题,它涉及公共决策时的民主程度,由此内含着权力与权利的博弈。化解邻避问题的关键在于建立决策者与对象之间的信任关系,并以预防矛盾激化为主。在参与决策意识觉醒、权利保护强化、依法治国战略深入推进以及生态文明体制改革不断深化的背景下,对城市邻避问题进行防控的最理想也是最有效的途径是法律。唯由法律对邻避设施的决策、实施、补偿和救济进行科学的规范,邻避问题以及可能的邻避危机或冲突才能得到有效预防和化解。 The NIMBY is a very serious and complex problem in the process of urbanization in China. Essentially, the NIMBY is not only related to the interests, but also the democratic degree while making public policies, including the game about the right and power. The key to resolving the NIMBY problem is to establish the trust between the decision makers and the decision objects, attaching more importance to avoiding the intensification of conflicts. In the background of the increasingly stronger awareness of participation in decisionmaking, better human rights protection, as well as further promoting the strategy of the rule of law and the reform of ecological civilization system, legislation is the most important and effective path to preventing and resolving the NIMBY problem. Only through the laws to regulate the decisionmaking, implementation, compensation and relief of the NIMBY facilities can the NIMBY problem as well as NIMBY crises or conflicts be possibly prevented and resolved.
作者 邹积超
出处 《城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期69-72,98,共5页 City Planning Review
关键词 邻避 城市化 环境保护 法律 NIMBY urbanization environmental protection legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1O' Hare Michael. Not on My Block You Don' t: Facility Sitting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation[J]. Public Policy, 1977,25(4):407-458. 被引量:1
  • 2赵志勇,朱礼华.环境邻避的经济学分析[J].社会科学,2013(10):60-66. 被引量:24
  • 3[英]达仁道夫·拉尔夫.现代社会冲突[M].林荣远,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000. 被引量:1
  • 4周林彬,董淳锷著..法律经济学[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2008:528.
  • 5Bzcot Hunter, Bowen Terry, Fitzgerald Michael P:. Managing the Solid Waste Crisis[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 1994, 22(2):229-244. 被引量:1
  • 6Daniel Mazmanian, David More]l. The NIMBY Synodrome: Facility Siting and the Failure of Democratic Discourse[M]//Vig Norman, Kraft Michael. Environmental Policy for ":he 1990s. Washington D C: Congressional quarterly Press, 1995:2;55-249. 被引量:1
  • 7[美]托马斯·约翰·克莱顿.公共决策中的公民参与[M].孙柏瑛,等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.2010. 被引量:1
  • 8陈佛保,郝前进.美国处理邻避冲突的做法[J].城市问题,2013(6):81-84. 被引量:30

二级参考文献16

  • 1朱玉明.地方利益、政府利益与官员利益——对地方政府行为的经济分析[J].东岳论丛,2006,27(1):93-96. 被引量:33
  • 2William Glaberson. Coping in the age of NIMBY[ N]. New York Times, 1955-06-19. 被引量:1
  • 3Kunreuther H, Fitzgerald K, and Aarts T D. Siting noxious facil-ities: a test of the facility siting credo[ J]. Risk Analysis, 1993 (3): 301 -318. 被引量:1
  • 4Karl R. Dorshimer. Siting major projects & the NIMBY phenome- non:the decker energy project in Charlotte, Michigan [J]. Eco- nomic Development Review, 1996 : 60 - 62. 被引量:1
  • 5Bacot, H. , Bowen, T. , and Fitzgerald, M. R. Managing the solid waste crisis [ J]. Policy Studies Journal, 1994(2) : 229 - 244. 被引量:1
  • 6Jenkins- Smith, H. , and Kunreuther, H. Mitigation and bene- fits measures as policy tools for siting potentially hazardous facili- ties : determinants of effectiveness and appropriateness [ J ]. Risk Analysis, 2001(2): 371 -382. 被引量:1
  • 7Gregory, R. , Kunreuther, H. , Easterling, D. , and Richards, K. Incentives policies to site hazardous waste facilities [ J]. Risk Analysis, 1991 (4) : 667 -675. 被引量:1
  • 8Kunreuther, H. , and Easterling, D. The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities [J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1996 (4) : 601 - 622. 被引量:1
  • 9Kunreuther, H. Voluntary procedures for siting noxious facilities: lotteries, auctions, and benefit sharing [ M ]. by Don Munton, Hazardous Waste Siting and Democratic Choice, 1996:338 - 357. 被引量:1
  • 10谭鸿仁、王俊隆:《邻避与风险社会:新店安坑掩埋场设嚣的个案分析》,《地理研究》2005年第42期. 被引量:1

共引文献50

同被引文献63

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部