摘要
在中国正史民族传体例中,只有《汉书》将"西南夷"、"两粤"、"朝鲜"三传合一。班固"三方之开,皆自好事之臣"的评议,彰显《汉书》民族传文本体例蕴涵特定的类别划分标准和准则。《汉书》所反映的班固的边疆观和民族思想,是对西汉边疆民族思想的全面反思和总结,充分反映了班固所处时期的时代特征,也具有明显的历史局限。
In all the ethnographies in Chinese official history books,only Hanshu cooperates the three ethnographies of Xinanyi,Liangyue,Chaoxian into one volume.As Bangu(班固) reviewed,'these three places' exploitation is the result of some officious personnel',which manifested the criteria in writing ethnography of Hanshu.Bangu's thoughts on borderland and its peoples,as it was showed in Hanshu,was a comprehensive reflection and conclusion of the thoughts On borderland and its peoples of the West Han Dynasty,which reflected the character of Bangu's contemporary,and had its own historical limitation.
出处
《中国边疆史地研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期64-72,181,共9页
China's Borderland History and Geography Studies
关键词
《汉书》
三传合一
边疆民族思想
Thoughts on Borderland and Its Peoples
Hanshu
Three Ethnographies into One Volume
