期刊文献+

吻合器痔上黏膜钉合术的临床应用现状与反思 被引量:7

Clinical application of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着肛垫滑动学说被广泛接受,痔上黏膜钉合术(procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids,PPH)在世界各地得到广泛的应用.PPH的核心技术是通过环形切除痔核上方一圈黏膜,悬吊肛垫,恢复肛管黏膜正常解剖结构,阻断部分痔上部分血流供应,使痔核逐渐萎缩.尽管PPH顺应现代快速康复的微创化理念,且短期疗效显著(出血少、术后痛苦轻和恢复快),并有望成为"一日手术".但随后更多的回顾性研究和荟萃分析表明,与传统手术相比,仍存在一些不足,例如费用较高,远期复发率较高等.本文主要就PPH在临床的应用现状、术后并发症和相应对策进行相关探讨,以便为临床更好地应用PPH治疗痔病提供参考. As the sliding anal cushion theory is widely accepted, the procedure for prolapse andhemorrhoids(PPH) has been applied all over the world. PPH mainly involves restoring the normal anatomy of the anal canal by circular excision of the mucosa above the hemorrhoids. Therefore, the blood supply is partially blocked so that hemorrhoids will gradually shrink. PPH has many advantages such as rapid rehabilitation, minimal invasiveness, and good short-term outcome(early resumption, less rectal bleeding and postoperative pain). However, many retrospective studies and meta-analyses indicate that, compared with the traditional surgery, PPH still has a number of deficiencies, including relatively high costs, high rates of relapse in a long term and so on. This review discusses the strategies, postoperative complications and clinical application of PPH.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 2015年第14期2245-2249,共5页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
基金 江苏省"十二五"中医药重点学科基金资助项目 No.JS1301~~
关键词 痔上黏膜钉合术 肛垫滑动学说 Hemorrhoids Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids Sliding anal cushion theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Hemorrhoidal disease: A comprehensive review. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204:102-117 [PMID: 17189119]. 被引量:1
  • 2Vinson-Bonnet B. [Hemorrhoidal surgery: new trends for day-case surgery]. Presse Med 2014; 43:297-300 [PMID: 24485829 DOh 10.1016/ j.lpm.2013.1106]. 被引量:1
  • 3Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoids Prolapsed with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. Rome: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1998:3-6. 被引量:1
  • 4Manfredelli S, Montalto G, Leonetti G, Covotta M, Amatucci C, Covotta A, Forte A. Conventional (CH) vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) in surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Ten years experience. Ann Ital Chit 2012; 83:129-134 [PMID: 22462333]. 被引量:1
  • 5于常虎.痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术治疗痔疮的疗效观察[J].慢性病学杂志,2015,15(1):87-88. 被引量:2
  • 6Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1837-1845 [PMID: 15622575 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0679-81. 被引量:1
  • 7Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50:878-892 [PMID: 17380367 DOI: 10.1007/ s10350-006-0852-3]. 被引量:1
  • 8Cosenza UM, Conte S, Mari FS, Nigri G, Milillo A, Gasparrini M, Pancaldi A, Brescia A. Stapled anopexy as a day surgery procedure: our experience over 400 cases. Surgeon 2013; 11 Suppl 1:$10-$13 [PMID: 23165103 DOI: 10.1016/ j.surge.2012.09.005]. 被引量:1
  • 9Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 2009; 144:266-272 [PMID: 19289667 DOI: 10.1001/ arehsurg.2008.591]. 被引量:1
  • 10Burch J, Epstein D, Sari AB, Weatherly H, Jayne D, Fox D, Woolacott N. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 233-243; discussion 243 [PMID: 18637932 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01638.x]. 被引量:1

二级参考文献44

共引文献119

同被引文献102

引证文献7

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部