期刊文献+

12针前列腺穿刺活检中单针阳性的临床病理意义 被引量:14

Clinicopathological implications of single positive core prostate cancer in a 12-core transrectal biopsy scheme
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 通过对前列腺穿刺活检单针阳性并随之行前列腺根治手术患者的临床及病理参数进行分析,评估穿刺单针阳性前列腺癌的临床意义.方法 对45例接受12针前列腺穿刺活检中单针阳性确诊为前列腺癌并随后行前列腺癌根治术的患者的临床及病理资料进行分析,评价手术前后病理结果的非一致性,分析肿瘤术后病理分级及分期升高、神经周围侵犯、切缘阳性等肿瘤被低估的可能危险因素.结果 最终的根治病理显示,只有31.1%的患者为单侧前列腺癌.66.7%患者的术后分期升高;37.8%患者术后Gleason评分升高;31.1%患者术后切缘阳性.多因素Logistic回归分析显示,穿刺标本肿瘤组织百分率可能是肿瘤术后Gleason评分升高、术前临床分期低估及神经周围侵犯的危险因素.未发现患者的年龄、前列腺体积、术前血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和PSA密度对肿瘤被低估有显著影响.结论 大部分前列腺穿刺单针阳性患者的肿瘤负荷被低估.穿刺标本肿瘤组织百分率可能是肿瘤被低估的危险因素.目前尚无法在术前准确预测局灶或单侧前列腺癌. Objective To explore the clinicopathological implications of single positive core prostate cancer.Methods A total of 45 patients with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy were diagnosed with single positive core prostate cancer and subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).Their clinicopathological parameters were examined to identify the factors for disease upgrading or upstaging.Results On final pathology,only 31.1% patients had unilateral prostate cancer.And 37.8% patients experienced Gleason score upgrading,66.7% patients had upstaging and 31.1% were found positive surgical margins.On multivariable analyses,the percentage of positive cores was an independent predictor of stage upgrading and perineural invasion at RP pathology.Age,prostate volume and preoperative prostatespecific antigen/prostate-specific antigen density (PSA/PSAD) had no significant effect on underestimated tumor burden.Conclusions Most single positive core prostate cancer diagnosed by 12-core biopsy may be underestimated.The percentage of positive cores is an independent predictor of underestimated prostate cancer.Currently we have no instruments for accurately identifying microfocal or unilateral prostate cancer.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第20期1602-1605,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 江苏省六大人才高峰(WSN-005) 南京市卫生局杰出青年基金(JQX12004)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 穿刺活检 前列腺切除术 Prostate neoplasms Puncture biopsy Prostatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1韩苏军,张思维,陈万青,李长岭.中国前列腺癌死亡现状及流行趋势分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2012,33(11):836-839. 被引量:71
  • 2Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer, part 1 : screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013 [ J 1. Eur Urol, 2014,65 (2) : 124-137. 被引量:1
  • 3李贵忠,曾荔,张军,杨新宇,夏同礼,郭应禄,那彦群.前列腺穿刺活检预测前列腺癌的病理分期[J].中华医学杂志,2003,83(15):1361-1362. 被引量:3
  • 4Ahn H J, Ko YH, Jang HA, et al. Single positive core prostate cancer in a 12-core transrectal biopsy scheme: clinicopathological implications compared with multifocal counterpart [ J ]. Korean J Urol, 2010,51(9) :671-776. 被引量:1
  • 5Warlick C, Trock B J, Landis P, et al. Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2006,98 ( 5 ) : 355-357. 被引量:1
  • 6Nelson JB. Focal therapy will become standard treatment for localized prostate cancer : con [ J ]. J Urol, 2012,187 ( 10 ) : 791 - 792. 被引量:1
  • 7Lecornet E, Ahmed HU, Moore CM, et al. Conceptual basis for focal therapy in prostate cancer[ J ]. J Endourol, 2010,24 (11 ) : 811-818. 被引量:1
  • 8Isbarn H, Karakiewicz PI, Vogel S, et al. Unilateral prostate cancer cannot be accurately predicted in low-risk patients [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010,77(10) :784-787. 被引量:1
  • 9Ahyai SA, Isbarn H, Karakiewicz PI, et al. The presence of prostate cancer on saturation biopsy can be accurately predicted [J]. BJU Int, 2010,105(8) :636-641. 被引量:1
  • 10Ricardo KdS, Dall'Oglio MF, Sant'Ana AC, et al. Can single positive core prostate cancer at biopsy be considered a low-risk disease after radical prostatectomy[ J ]. Int B raz J Urol, 2013,39 (12) :800-807. 被引量:1

二级参考文献42

  • 1Heidenreich A,Richter S,Thüer D,et al.Prognostic parameter,complications,and oncologic and functional outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after 21st-century radiotherapy.Eur Urol,2010,57(3):437-445. 被引量:1
  • 2Cheng L,Sebo TJ,Slezak J,et al.Predictors of survival for prostate carcinoma patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy.Cancer,1998,83 (10):2164-2171. 被引量:1
  • 3Cheng L,Slezak J,Bergstralh EJ,et al.Dedifferentiation in metastatic progression of prostate cancer.Cancer,1999,86 (4):657-663. 被引量:1
  • 4Gleason DF.Classification of prostatic carcinomas.Cancer Chemother Rep,1 966,50 (3):125 -128. 被引量:1
  • 5Mellinger GT,Gleason D,Bailar J 3rd.The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer.J Urol,1967,97(2):331-337. 被引量:1
  • 6Gleason DF,Mellinger GT.Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.J Urol,1974,111(1):58-64. 被引量:1
  • 7Mellinger GT.Prognosis of prostatic carcinoma.Recent Results Cancer Res,1977,60:61-72. 被引量:1
  • 8Gleason DF.Histological grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma//Tannenbaum M.Urologic pathology.The prostate.Philadelphia:Lea and Feibiger,1977:171-198. 被引量:1
  • 9Hodge KK,McNeal JE,Terris MK,et al.Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.J Urol,1989,142 (1):71-74. 被引量:1
  • 10Amin MB,Schultz DS,Zarbo RJ.Analysis of cribriform morphology in prostatic neoplasia using antibody to high-molecularweight cytokeratins.Arch Pathol Lab Med,1994,118(3):260-264. 被引量:1

共引文献83

同被引文献104

  • 1Bastwick DG,Foster CS. Predictive factors in prostate cancer current concepts from the 1999 college of American pathologists conference on solid tumor prognostic factors and the 1999 World Health Organization second international consultation on prostate cancer[J]. Semin Urol Oncol,1999,17(4):222-272. 被引量:1
  • 2Roberta Mazzucchelli,Andrea Benedetto Galosi,Antonio Lopez -Beltran, et al. Pathological issues in biopsy specimens of men with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance[J]. Associazione Ricerche in Urologia,2014,86(4):314-318. 被引量:1
  • 3Dickinson SI. Premalignant and malignant prostate lesions : Pathologic review[J]. Cancer Control,2010,17(4);214-222. 被引量:1
  • 4Alenda O, Ploussard G, Mouracade P, et al. Impact of the primary Gleason pattern on biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: a single-center cohort of 1,248 patients with Gleason 7 tumors [ J ]. World J Urol,2011,29 ( 5 ) : 671-676. DOI: 10. 1007/s00345-010-0620-9. 被引量:1
  • 5Amin A, Partin A, Epstein JI. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary Pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomy [ J 1. J Urol, 2011,186(4) : 1286-1290. DOI: 10. 1016/j. juro. 2011.05. 075. 被引量:1
  • 6Rieardo Kupka da S, Dall' Oglio MF, Sant' Ana AC, et al. Cansingle positive core prostate cancer at biopsy be considered a low- risk disease after radical prostatectomy? [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2013,39 (6) : 800-807. DOI : 10. 1590/S1677-5538. IBJU. 2013. 06.05. 被引量:1
  • 7Trock B J, Guo CC, Gonzalgo ML, et al. Tertiary G|eason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system[J]. J Urol,2009,182(4) :1364- 1370. DOI: 10. 1016/j. juro. 2009.06. 048. 被引量:1
  • 8Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, et al. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A : renal, penile, and testicular tumours [ J ]. Eur Urol,2016, pii: S0302-2838 (16) 00206-2. DO1: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2016.02. 029. 被引量:1
  • 9孙枫,吴瑛,陈立新,陈彤,张玉娟.经直肠超声造影在不同类型前列腺癌诊断中的应用[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2009,18(8):702-704. 被引量:4
  • 10查月琴,沈卫东,林和平,蔡宗强,陈卫国,沈玲玲,蔡晓峰,侯建全.超声造影诊断前列腺良恶性病变的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2010,19(1):32-35. 被引量:13

引证文献14

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部