摘要
医疗纠纷具有较强的专业性,这决定了鉴定在医疗民事诉讼中的重要地位。本文以北京市法院2013年度一审审结的医疗损害责任纠纷案件为样本,分析了医疗诉讼中的鉴定实况,指出法官和当事人均存在较为严重的"鉴定依赖"倾向,鉴定活动大多未遵循就"专门性问题"进行"专业评议"与"同行鉴定"的原则,医疗鉴定的性质定位与功能认识存在偏差,鉴定权与审判权的分野模糊,庭审对鉴定意见的质证不充分,法官对鉴定意见的评价能力不足。在此基础上,提出了改革与重构我国医疗诉讼鉴定制度的路径与建议。
Medical dispute often is highly specialized, which determines the important position of forensic examination （or appraisal） in civil actions in medical lawsuits. This article based on concluded cases of the court of ifrst instance on medical damage liability disputes in Beijing in 2013 as samples, analyzes the appraisal of medical litigation in reality, points out that both judges and the litigation parties have a strong tendency to rely upon identiifcation, appraisal activities have not followed the principles of “professional review” on “special problems” and “peer appraisal”, and there exist deviations in understandings of the nature and function of medical appraisal, the fuzzy between appraisal rights and the judicial power in adjudication, inadequate examination of expert opinion at trial, lacking the ability to evaluate the judgment of expert opinion by judges. Based on all these, we put forward the reform and reconstruction proposals, and suggestions of the identiifcation of medical litigation system in China.
出处
《证据科学》
CSSCI
2015年第2期224-238,共15页
Evidence Science
基金
北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"北京市医疗纠纷非诉讼解决机制(ADR)的改革与完善"(编号:12FXB015)
