摘要
植被遥感监测中长时间序列数据择优的重建方法,已成为当今一个研究热点。本文以东北地区5种主要植被覆盖类型为例,在定性分析TIMESAT提供的3种常用重建方法对EVI(Enhanced Vegetation Index)时序曲线重建效果的基础上,定量对比研究了各方法,对原始高质量EVI点真实值的保真性,及对原始曲线整体特征的保持度。结果表明:S-G(Savitzky-Golay)滤波对原始曲线生长季的峰值及宽度重建效果较好,但容易因过度拟合保留过多噪声,特别是草地和灌丛类型;非对称性高斯函数(AG)和双Logistic曲线(DL)方法相似,对草地、灌丛和耕地的重建结果更接近真实值,但AG拟合对波峰处异常值的处理结果较差,重建后波峰表现低平。3种算法对原始EVI时序数据的保真性和对原始时序数据曲线特征的保持度,都表现出与植被类型分布相关的空间分布格局。分析结果表明,在东北地区,AG算法对草原和灌丛的重建效果最好,DL算法对耕地重建效果最优,S-G算法最适合对落叶阔叶林和落叶针叶林进行重建处理。
With the rapid development of remote sensing techniques, higher precisions of the vegetation remote sensing are required. Therefore, before using the time-series data, how to select the optimal algorithms to recon- struct it has been a hot research topic. Based on the five main land cover types in Northeast China, the reconstruc- tion quality of three commonly used algorithms that included in TIMESAT tools has been qualitatively analyzed. Then, the fidelity performance and the capability to keep main characteristics of the three algorithms on EVI with respect to different land cover types were compared. The result shows that the S-G algorithm has a better performance in reconstructing the peak and the width of the EVI curves in the growing seasons, but it is prone to keep the noise data due to excessive fittings, especially common in land cover types of steppe and shrub. AG and DL algorithms generally present similar performances and the results are much closer to the true values for land cover types of steppe, shrub and arable land. But AG algorithm is easily influenced by noises for fitting the peak of the cures, which reduces the maximum EVI and causes the decline of vegetation growth. Spatial patterns of the fidelity performance and the capability to keep main characteristics of the three algorithms are all related to the distribution of vegetation types. Finally, we found that AG is a better algorithm to be used for the land cover types of steppe and shrub, DL is better for arable land, while S-G is better for the broadleaved deciduous forest and coniferous deciduous forest.
出处
《地球信息科学学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第6期732-741,共10页
Journal of Geo-information Science
基金
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(41001279)
资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室青年人才培养基金项目(O8R8B690PA)
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项"应对气候变化的碳收支认证及相关问题"(XDA05050102)
