摘要
行政问责以回应性为核心,并且结合追责的实现方式,是代议制民主模式下权力对民意的服从以及民意对权力的监督要求。从现有药品监管领域的问责事件来看,我国药品监管行政问责存在偏重事后问责、问责对象模糊不清、裁量余地过大、政府的回应方式与力度不能满足问责制的基本要求,以及问责处理结果的透明度不足等问题。为推进药品监管行政问责的法治化,在实践中应做到于法有据、权责一致、全面问责、公开透明以及社会共治。
Administrative accountability, which takes responsiveness as its core and is realized by calling to account, is the compliance of power to the will of the people in the mode of representative democracy and the demand of popular will of power supervision. Seen from the present incidents of drug supervision, there are problems of laying particular stress on ex post accountability, of ambiguous object, of too much discretion, of inefficiency in the response mechanism and dynamics and of lacking transparency in the handling results.In order to enhance the legalization of the administrative accountability, it is necessary to act with lawfully recognized evidence, align power with responsibility, be accountable for every administrative action, be transparent and involve multiple participation.
出处
《石河子大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第2期102-109,共8页
Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
清华大学法学院卫生法研究中心"清华-拜耳基金"项目
关键词
行政问责
药品监管
药害事件
法治
administrative accountability
drug supervision
adverse drug events
rule of law
