期刊文献+

腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术在治疗老年患者中的临床研究 被引量:8

Clinical Study on Laparoscopic Surgery in Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨老年直肠癌患者行腹腔镜微创手术的治疗效果。方法:回顾性分析了2008年7月至2011年1月本院收治的91例老年直肠癌患者,按治疗方式分为腹腔镜组39例和开腹组52例,术后随访3年,比较分析两组患者围手术期、手术并发症及预后情况。结果:腹腔镜组患者的术中出血量、肠功能恢复时间、术后发热请况及住院时间均优于开腹组(P<0.05);腹腔镜组并发症发生率为2.6%,低于开腹组的21.1%(P<0.05);腹腔镜组局部复发率、远处转移率及死亡率与开腹组比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:老年直肠癌患者行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术效果相当,且安全、微创,但远期疗效尚需进一步研究证明。 Objective: To study the effect of elderly patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic minimally invasive operation. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 91 cases was conducted on elderly patients with colorectal cancer who were treated in our hospital from July 2008 to January 2011. The patients were divided into laparoscopic group(39 cases) and laparotomy group(52 cases)according to the treatment methods, followed-up for 3 years, postoperative. The perioperative situation, operation complications and prognosis of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results: The amount of bleeding, intestinal function recovery time,postoperative fever and hospitalization time in the laparoscopic group were better than those of laparotomy group(P〈0.05); The complication rate was 2.6%, lower than 21.1% of laparotomy group(P〈0.05); There was no significant difference in local recurrence rate,distant metastasis rate and mortality between the two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion: The clinical effect of elderly patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic operation is similar to laparotomy operation, it's safe and minimally invasive, but the long-term efficacy needs further study to prove.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2015年第18期3548-3550,3483,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠癌 老年人 效果 Laparoscope Rectal cancer Aged Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

  • 1郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜在直肠癌保肛手术中的应用与评价[J].肿瘤学杂志,2005,11(6):399-402. 被引量:9
  • 2郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术在中低位直肠癌手术中的应用现状与展望[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(2):99-101. 被引量:53
  • 3周光荣,刘卫东,赵耀,王泰岳,于仁,孙跃明.腹腔镜结肠直肠癌切除术[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(2):114-115. 被引量:3
  • 4Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP. Laparosc-opic versus open sur- gery for rectal cancer: ameta-analysis [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2006,13 (3) :413-424. 被引量:1
  • 5Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer[J]. Br J Surg,2002,89(12) :1551-1556. 被引量:1
  • 6Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, et al. Bladder and sexual function fol- lowing resectionfor rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of lapa- roscopic versus open technique [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2005,92 ( 9 ) : 1124- 1132. 被引量:1
  • 7Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, et al. Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial[J]. Br J Surg,2010,97(1):70-78. 被引量:1
  • 8Hotta T, Takifuji K, Yokoyama S, et al. Rectal transac- tion by the Nelaton catheter pulling method during a la- paroscopic low anterior resection[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011,54(4):495-500. 被引量:1
  • 9Saklani AP, Shah P, Naquib N, et al. Transanal division of the anorectal junction followed by laparoscopic low an- terior resection and aoloanal pouch anastomosis: A tech- nique facilitated by a balloon port[J]. J Minim AccessSurg,2011,7(3):195-199. 被引量:1
  • 10D'Hoore A, Wolthuis AM. Laparoscopic low anterior re- section and transanal pull-through for low rectal cancer: a Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) technique[J]. Coloreetal Dis,2011,13 (Suppl 7 ) :28-31. 被引量:1

共引文献43

同被引文献33

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部