摘要
知识产权高等法院的设立是日本"知识产权立国"政策最大的亮点,其主要目的是建立技术类知识产权案件二审的专门法院,并设立了大合议、法院调查员和专门委员制度。由于特许厅在专利的数量控制上占优势,故特许厅的审判前置在确保专门性这一点上仍具有独立的价值。另一方面,知识产权高等法院为实现多元集中化进行了各种尝试,然而该尝试时常受到大合议的干扰,因此需要避免大合议过早干预,同时须处理好知识产权高等法院与最高法院的关系,形成良好的运行机制。
The establishment of the Intellectual Property High Court(IP High Court) in 2005 is the biggest highlight of 'IP-Based Nation' policy in Japan,the main purpose of which is to build a specialized appellate court in lawsuits relating to technological IP.Systems of Grand Panel,Judicial Research Officials and Technical Advisers are built simultaneously.As the matter of specialization,advantages in quantitative control of JPO give independent value to the principle requiring a JPO invalidation trial decision prior to filing a suit.IP High Court attempts to realize 'diversification in Centralization',unfortunately this has sometimes been disturbed by poor operations of Grand Panel proceeding.Therefore,we should avoid premature intervention of the Grand Panel,deal properly with the relationship between IP High Court and Supreme Court to build a well-operated system.
出处
《科技与法律》
2015年第3期552-573,共22页
Science Technology and Law
关键词
知识产权高等法院
专门性
多元集中
大合议
IP High Court
Specialization
Diversification in Centralization
Grand Panel
