摘要
囿于史料有限,学界对于胡适与宋明理学的关系鲜有论述。然在探究胡适先生的中英文著作并加以相互参照时不难发现,过去学者对胡适的宋明理学观论述某些观点值得商榷。胡适不但早于冯友兰将宋明理学称为"新儒学"或"新儒家",而且亦早于冯友兰先生《中国哲学史》的英译者卜德将"理学"英译为"Neo-Confucianism"。在"民主"与"科学"思想的观照下,胡适先生对理学的评价多为负面,认为清代的考据学源于宋代之理学但又回归到经院哲学,而宋明理学在发展过程中的主要弊端在于背离"经世致用"。同时,胡适还辨明了理学与佛、道教之间的历史渊源以及理学的终极目标。这些都是颇有价值的见解,对其进行深入挖掘在一定程度上可以填补胡适研究之不足。
With the lack of the documents ,the academic circle seldom remarked on the relation between Hu Shi and Song and Ming Neo‐Confucianism . However , with the comparative analysis of Hu’ s works both in Chinese and English ,it is not difficult to find that some scholars’ opinions of Hu’s remarks on Song and Ming Neo‐Confucianism are worth discussion . He not only named Song and Ming Neo‐Confucianism “new Confucian School” or “new Confucianism” prior to Feng Youlan ,but also translated it into English as Neo‐Confucianism prior to Bodde ,translator of Feng’s work History of Chinese Philosophy .In the light of science and democracy ,Mr .Hu Shi’s remarks on Neo‐Confucianism were mainly negative .He thought textology in the Qing Dynasty could be traced back to Neo‐Confucianism but returned to scholasticism and its main defects were its deviating from pragmatism in its development . Meanwhile ,He also clarified the historical relation between Neo‐Confucianism and Buddhism and Taoism together with its ultimate objects . All these are worthy ideas , which will complement the lack of research on Hu Shi to a certain degree .
出处
《合肥学院学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第3期7-11,87,共6页
Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences
关键词
胡适
理学
民主
科学
新儒学
Hu Shi
Neo-Confucianism
democracy
science
new Confucianism
